The Calder Trophy

by Lowetide

I was sitting in my Grandma’s living room in Maidstone Saskatchewan the day they handed out the 1980 Calder Trophy to Raymond Bourque. I was both thrilled (Bourque was a wonderful player, and a Bruin, plus the first Boston defenseman to win since Orr) and angered (Wayne Gretzky was ruled ineligible because the WHA—a league flogged far and wide by NHL bigheads—was suddenly deemed a league worthy of disqualifying 99 simply because he destroyed that league too). Will the Oilers ever have a Calder Trophy winner? Maybe. It’s likely to come in a season no one expects it. Like this one.

THE ATHLETIC!

Give The Athletic as a gift or get it yourself and join the fun! Offer is here, less than $4 a month! I find myself reading both the hockey (Willis, Dellow, Pronman, et cetera) and the baseball coverage a lot, it’s a pure pleasure to visit. We’ll sell you the whole seat, but you’ll only need the edge.

ROOKIE FORWARDS THIS CENTURY

I’ve been tracking rookies for approximately one forever, so feel somewhat qualified to discuss the issue. The Oilers have had some good candidates over the years, it might be an idea to review the happenings since the turn of the century. Back then, I tracked players by “even strength points-per-60” because that was all that was available to me. It changes to 5-on-5 per 60 down the page.

  • All of the rookies who posted 1.90 or better had substantial NHL careers. Is that the line in the sand?
  • Only one player below that number flourished in the NHL. Jarrett Stoll, who posted just 1.39/60 as a rookie.
  • Mike Comrie arrived in time to grab Doug Weight’s wingers. He did well.
  • Shawn Horcoff did not receive the same winger gifts but he did well.
  • Ales Hemsky was Mr. Entertainment the moment he arrived. Proud to say I enjoyed every one of his offensive sorties and cheered until I had brain damage from which I have subsequently recovered. Seriously.
  • Fernando Pisani was a terrific rookie, Jason Chimera was pretty damned good too.

  • Nothing in 2004-05 (lockout), 2005-06 (trying to win a Stanley) and no one had much offensively in 2006-07.
  • The J-F Jacques boxcars are not a typo.
  • The 2007-08 group brought the lumber, but some in the group had trouble with the glove. All three remain in the NHL one decade later, I think the only career that turned out as predicted would be Kyle Brodziak.
  • I think Andrew Cogliano outlasts the group here. He’s going to be fast at 50.

  • We’re 5-on-5 per 60 now and we’re using Natural Stat Trick.
  • Edmonton received 63 goals from rookie forwards in 2010-11. They’re all gone.
  • Taylor Hall was thrown to the wolves, played a ton. Jordan Eberle, two years older, was a more efficient scorer.
  • I always thought Linus Omark and Magnus Paajarvi should have made it, tend to blame the coaches. Then again, I’m not sure it’s reasonable to expect a coach to develop rookie skill wingers four at a time.

  • Ryan Nugent-Hopkins posted solid offensive numbers at 5-on-5 and 5-on-4 as a rookie, although injuries kept his boxcars from looking impressive.
  • Nail Yakupov posted the best 5-on-5 per 60 scoring number among No. 1 overall selections 2010-12. It didn’t do much good but he did score well (especially late in the season) in the discipline.
  • Mark Arcobello is an amazing story, if there is a Hockey God Marcobello will write a book about succeeding through willpower and belief in yourself, and then coach Pittsburgh to a Stanley Cup victory.

  • Connor McDavid posted the best 5-on-5 number of the century for the Oilers’ rookie forwards, a mammoth 2.73. There’s zero doubt he would have broken the Calder drought had he stayed healthy. Probably looking at a playoff spring, too.
  • Leon Draisaitl struggled in his rookie season, blossomed the following year.
  • Anton Slepyshev and Drake Caggiula were two of ‘the 94s’ Peter Chiarelli mentioned as being important to the team. Neither man performed at a level where we can project them to stay a long time.
  • Pontus Aberg is a dynamic young player who should get a solid look this coming season. There are several things to like about him, including good speed and terrific hands.
  • Jesse Puljujarvi had impressive rookie spurts (1.99 5-on-5 per 60 in November) but couldn’t find consistency. He’s 20 now, this is his time.
  • Kailer Yamamoto has a real chance, he has to win a job alongside 97 or 29. If he does, and finds his way to the power play (and can help make it successful), Edmonton may end its Calder famine.

OILERS RIGHT WINGERS VIA THE DRAFT

Two of the last three first-round selections were devoted to right wingers, and really we’re all just waiting for these men to arrive as bona fide NHL players. Over the years, the Oilers have drafted many outstanding RW’s, but have done so without using high draft picks.

  • Glenn Anderson No. 69 overall in 1979
  • Jari Kurri No. 69 overall in 1980
  • Miro Satan No. 111 overall in 1993
  • Ales Hemsky No. 13 overall in 2001
  • Jordan Eberle No. 22 overall in 2008
  • Nail Yakupov No. 1 overall in 2012
  • Jesse Puljujarvi No. 4 overall in 2016
  • Kailer Yamamoto No. 22 overall in 2017

Since 2012 the club has used higher picks, Nail Yakupov representing enormous opportunity lost. I remain confident in the two latest candidates, this season will tell us a lot. Reasonable expectations for Puljujarvi are a full NHL season, something close to 16-20 goals, and a springtime emergence as a difficult out in the postseason. Yamamoto’s path reasonably includes minor league time, I’m suggesting a 50-50 split between Bakersfield and Edmonton. We wait.

LOWDOWN WITH LOWETIDE

We’re back, at 10 this morning with a wide range of guests and jocularity. TSN1260, scheduled to appear:

  • Jimmy Morrison, Edmonton Prospects PBP. Prospects through to second round and facing tough Medicine Hat. We’ll chat about a fabulous season and postseason in Edmonton.
  • Guy Flaming, The Pipeline Show. First blush at the Hlinka-Gretzky, who impressed yesterday?
  • Scott Cullen, TSN. CFL Week in review and the one ahead, the Hurricanes-Sabres Skinner trade and when do NHL execs get back in the office?
  • Devan Fink, Beyond the Boxscore. Why is MLB suffering in attendance?

10-1260 text, @Lowetide on twitter. See you on the radio!

103 comments
0

You may also like

0 0 vote
Article Rating
103 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scungilli Slushy

Bouchard is 2.5 months older than Dobson. Is that really a big deal?

Scungilli Slushy

OilSlickster:
VOR,

Please reach out to Milan !!

And the Oilers

Ryan

VOR,

Yes, the major determinants are age and genetics.

Lucic is getting older while the game is getting faster.

Here’s a cool graph: http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2015/07/20/sprinters-dont-improve-after-30-gatlins-feats-are-incredible-200701/

For 100m sprinters, surprisingly the precipice in this graph lies between 30 and 31.

who

OriginalPouzar: Did they say they picked him because he was older and closer to the NHL?I don’t recall them actually saying this but they only bring up his age when asked about him being on the team or related questions.

From what I have read and seen, they say they picked him because, not only was he the best player available at the spot but he also checked so many boxes of team need.The fact that he may be closer to the NHL seems like a bonus but not a reason they chose him over a guy like Dobson or Whalstrom.

I’ve never seen Bouchard play so don’t have a very strong opinion on him. The only negatives I can think of are SOME questions about forward skating and his age. I certainly don’t view his age at the draft as a positive. In fact his age and the minutes he played in London take some of the shine off his numbers in my opinion.
I did see Dobson at the Memorial Cup and was very impressed. Would have been a good pick at 10OV. Bouchard will probably turn out to be a good pick as well but I am not fully on board until I actually see him play.

Ryan

JimmyV1965: I might be wrong about this, but even in his rookie year was Drai not one of the faster skaters on the team when they did timed runs in practice?

I might be wrong too, but I thought that was during a skills comp during his sophomore season.

Either way, the reason he looked so slow during his rookie season wasn’t his top end speed.

There are some big players that have decent top end speed (if they’re fresh), but don’t accelerate quickly. On top of that if the coast a lot or play too long of shifts, they’ll look really slow.

Contrast that with a guy like McDavid and it’s partly his ridiculous acceleration that make him such a threat. Two strides and he’s going full speed.

OriginalPouzar

leadfarmer:
theDjdj,

No.They stated that Bouchard was picked because he was older and closer to the NHL which is rather silly.We have enough data that shows younger players in their draft year have higher equivalcies.
If Bouchard isn’t in the league in 2 years, which is quite expected in my point of view, what do they do with him?

Did they say they picked him because he was older and closer to the NHL? I don’t recall them actually saying this but they only bring up his age when asked about him being on the team or related questions.

From what I have read and seen, they say they picked him because, not only was he the best player available at the spot but he also checked so many boxes of team need. The fact that he may be closer to the NHL seems like a bonus but not a reason they chose him over a guy like Dobson or Whalstrom.

jp

godot10: He was playing with one shoulder (he had a torn labrum) during the Krueger season.At one point, he and Gagner were the only “healthy” centres on the team…and Nugent-Hopkins wasn’t healthy.

It was far from the worst of a year.He played with courage and determination, nursing a serious injury.

Courage and determination, that’s a new one. So you think the rest of the numbers fit the narrative nicely?

jp

Bank Shot,

Professor Q,

Thanks for the extra info. Makes sense.

leadfarmer

theDjdj,

No. They stated that Bouchard was picked because he was older and closer to the NHL which is rather silly. We have enough data that shows younger players in their draft year have higher equivalcies.
If Bouchard isn’t in the league in 2 years, which is quite expected in my point of view, what do they do with him?

OriginalPouzar

Bank Shot: He was born in Canada but grew up in Russia according to what I can find.

He definitely has a non Canadian accent.

This is my understanding as well and I’m confident that he got “dinged” by the Russian management team for leaving Russia for Canada which is why he didn’t make the World Junior Team last year or get invited to their camp.

We’ll see if he makes the team this coming year – unless he has a huge regression this coming season, he should be a lock for the team on merit, however, you never know with the Russian teams (although they put Samorukov on the team last year even though he crossed the Atlantic to play in the OHL).

As an aside, Niagra acquired Ivan Lodina from Eerie – might be a linemate of Maksimov this coming year.

Leon McMesstzky

VOR,

Please reach out to Milan !!

Wilde

Aberg-Khaira-Caggiula randomly smashed Filip Forsberg’s line in this game I’m reviewing, not even exaggerating. Punched them into the NST line tool and only found 18 minutes, but the winger set has a hundred decent minutes together(69-71 Fenwick for; 22-15 high danger and 6-6 goals), could run them on the Brodziak line.

Or just keep the whole trio together if you’re doing a Strome in the top 6 setup.

godot10

jp: The Kruger year was actually the worst of his career.

Overall, RNH’s 5×5/60 numbers do a very poor job supporting the horrific/mediocre coaching narratives.

He was playing with one shoulder (he had a torn labrum) during the Krueger season. At one point, he and Gagner were the only “healthy” centres on the team…and Nugent-Hopkins wasn’t healthy.

It was far from the worst of a year. He played with courage and determination, nursing a serious injury.

theDjdj

leadfarmer:
OriginalPouzar,

Uggh. A later birthday should never be a positive.Defensemen nature at their own damn pace and nothing you can do will speed that up.Later birthday means one thing and one thing only, a potentially lower ceiling than someone 9 months younger

Your comment contradicts itself, no? If you recognise that defensemen mature largely arbitrarily then surely an earlier birthday has little bearing on ceiling

VOR

BornInAGretzkyJersey:
Ryan,

Any chance training fast-twitch muscle fibres is possible with relatively advanced aged athletes?Is there a ceiling on age?

Or, to put another way, can we pair Looch with Drai’s off-season fitness trainer from the Czech Republic to improve his first step explosiveness?

I know you didn’t ask me. However, the simple answer is yes you can train fast twitch fibres at Milan Lucic’s age.

I want to clear up two common misconception before I go on.

There aren’t two types of muscle fibres in the human body. Morphologically there is a gradient from slow twitch fibres which are red, thin, and loaded with mitochondria to fast twitch fibres that are thick, white and have nearly no mitochondria. The former are called Type I fibres, the latter Type IIb or IIx. There are intermediate types. For now let’s focus on IIa. These are very thick fibres, pink in colour, with an intermediate number of mitochondria.

While the ratio of fibres is determined by genetics. The phenotype is highly variable. It is a practical impossibility to recruit 100% of your fibres of any type. So a person with 40% fast twitch fibres who had recruited 80% of them would be as explosive as somebody who had 60% fast twitch fibres but only recruited 50% of them. Training matters.

Can you recruit fast twitch fibres in your thirties? Sure. And in your 40s and 50s and 60s and 70s and 80s. Is it as easy as it was at 20? Of course not.

But to be a faster skater you need more than 1 type of fast twitch fibre. IIb is the fibre linked with sprinting, throwing, jumping, and weight lifting. A fast first step is reliant on Type IIb. But winning a race from one end of the ice to the other takes Type IIA the fibre of the long sprints, the 1K bike race, rowing, etc. Power over time.

You don’t train these two types of fibre the same way.

For that first step you’d do PAP supported by sprinting and Olympic Lifting. For the end to end race you’d do lots of reps very fast, sport specific training with challenges, and supplemental sports like rowing. You’d throw in box jumping to unite the types.

But then each athlete is different. Yoga, Pilates, tai chi, medicine ball/exercise ball may be necessary for flexibility and to improve core strength. And on and on.

Professor Q

jp,

I think he played in the GTHL, which quite a few Russian players specifically but those of other nationalities move to Toronto to play in (and go to private schools etc.). Younger Svechnikov moved to Michigan with his mother for a similar reason, to continue training at the top before getting into the OHL.

As for Maksimov, I remembered a bio I read a few years ago about him being born in Ontario, raised in Moscow, but returning to go to a private school and play in the GTHL.

https://edmontonjournal.com/sports/hockey/nhl/cult-of-hockey/kirill-maksimov

Not a Parise or Stastny situation where the adopted country is represented, nor a Hull situation where the player was spurned by their home and preferred country, nor an Oleksiak situation where the mind could not be made up and then the switch finally made to support his sister and to go to a club he could make (Canada), but sort of a “represents the country he grew up in, even if a dual citizen” situation, to the best of my knowledge.

Bank Shot

jp:
Seems like some Russian Intrigue here.

HockeyDB lists him as born in Concord, ON. Elite Prospects has his born in Moscow, Russia (and his nationality as Russia/Canada). He’s played in Canada at least since 2013, but internationally for Russia.

Presumably he’s a dual citizen with Russian parent(s). Does anyone know more about the back story? Has he been in Canada his whole life?

Did he choose to play for Russia cause he couldn’t make the Canadian U18 teams? (like Adam Deadmarsh). If so that’s odd too – doesn’t (didn’t?) Russia ding even guys who were developed in Russia and went to play in the CHL for their tournament rosters? So it seems surprising they’d add a guy who’d played exclusively in Canada his whole life to their Jr team.

A quick google search didn’t answer any of these questions, so any insight would be great!

He was born in Canada but grew up in Russia according to what I can find.

He definitely has a non Canadian accent.

jp

godot10: Eakins and McLellan killed Nugent-Hopkins offense with horrific and mediocre coaching.Nugent-Hopkins 5×5 offense was fine with Renney, Krueger, and Nelson.

He will be awesome on wing with McDavid.Even mediocre coaching can’t kill his offense there, although if the coach stick an AHL RW on the line, it might.

The Kruger year was actually the worst of his career.

Overall, RNH’s 5×5/60 numbers do a very poor job supporting the horrific/mediocre coaching narratives.

JimmyV1965

Ryan: succeed.

I might be wrong about this, but even in his rookie year was Drai not one of the faster skaters on the team when they did timed runs in practice?

jp

Professor Q: Which is odd, seeing as he’s Canadian.

OriginalPouzar:

With respect to the “Russian factor” – he was born in Canada (although associates with Russia for international play).

Seems like some Russian Intrigue here.

HockeyDB lists him as born in Concord, ON. Elite Prospects has his born in Moscow, Russia (and his nationality as Russia/Canada). He’s played in Canada at least since 2013, but internationally for Russia.

Presumably he’s a dual citizen with Russian parent(s). Does anyone know more about the back story? Has he been in Canada his whole life?

Did he choose to play for Russia cause he couldn’t make the Canadian U18 teams? (like Adam Deadmarsh). If so that’s odd too – doesn’t (didn’t?) Russia ding even guys who were developed in Russia and went to play in the CHL for their tournament rosters? So it seems surprising they’d add a guy who’d played exclusively in Canada his whole life to their Jr team.

A quick google search didn’t answer any of these questions, so any insight would be great!

BornInAGretzkyJersey

Ryan,

Any chance training fast-twitch muscle fibres is possible with relatively advanced aged athletes? Is there a ceiling on age?

Or, to put another way, can we pair Looch with Drai’s off-season fitness trainer from the Czech Republic to improve his first step explosiveness?

BornInAGretzkyJersey

pts2pndr,

Late to the party, but felt compelled to nettle away at a minor point.

I know for a fact my ancestors, along with many others at the time from different tribes, had the O’- dropped from their names summarily by the border agents at the gates of Ellis Island to make their names easier to pronounce or to more readily conform.

Not everyone chose to have their surnames mutilated.

Ryan

dustrock:
That 5v5 number for Draisaitl is crazy, what a difference a year made for him.

It’s like we have to take the 5v5 number but only in the season they are actually ready to play in the NHL ha ha ha

He literally couldn’t skate. He looked like he was skating in quick sand. You could tell he could think the game at a high level, handle the puck exceptionally well, backhand it like it was on his forehand… protect the puck well…

Draisaitl couldn’t get to the play.

Thank Gord, he found that step.

OriginalPouzar

pts2pndr: He missedapractice. This should not result in the way he as handled. There is possibly more to this story but if so what has been done to resolve the problem? There is much we do not know,but by what we see there is definte reason to question!

Well, yes, he missed that practice and, as I’ve said a bunch of times, that must be an absolute non-factor for the coaches at this point. If McLellan is “holding a grudge” then there is no point in having Aberg in the organization. It must be water under the bridge at this point.

He was punished, its time to move on. I give the head coach the benefit of the doubt on this, for now.

jtblack

pts2pndr:
Just a thought! Players drafted in the first round are afforded greater opportunity to succeed. Is the reason that fewer players drafted after the first round succeed due to their skill level and or lack of opportunity?

It’s a combination of the two

pts2pndr

Just a thought! Players drafted in the first round are afforded greater opportunity to succeed. Is the reason that fewer players drafted after the first round succeed due to their skill level and or lack of opportunity?

pts2pndr

OriginalPouzar: Did Aberg question the coach?

He missed a practice. This should not result in the way he as handled. There is possibly more to this story but if so what has been done to resolve the problem? There is much we do not know,but by what we see there is definte reason to question!

jtblack

Woodguy v2.0: Drai’s rookie year:

29 and Yak
181 min
CF% 49.7%
HDSF% 40%
GF% 16.7% (3-15)
SH% 3.13
SV% .857
PDO 888

That’s something.

That is … funny? Sad? Hell of a team he (they) had behind them.

godot10

jm363561: ======

Yes, my view on Bouchard being older than most of his peers is a possible negative. Griffin Reinhart was outstanding in junior but, in hindsight, it was mainly because he was bigger and stronger than his opponents. Same, to a lesser extent, with DNurse. Others have commented on how old Bouchard looks for his age and when his peers catch up physically he may not look quite so impressive – there was a reason he fell down the draft. Hope I am wrong.

On the positive side, they said the same about Aaron Ekblad…that he looked 25 with full man strength at 19.

I don’t care what Bouchard does at camp. I would send him down before going to Europe.

godot10

VOR:
For years I followed college hockey very seriously.

I mention this because it was at a college game in St. Cloud, Minnesota that I first asked a scout to explain how he went about judging a player. It was the spring of 1996. The scout was a guy named Paul Anderson who I think was working for the Flyers at the time. He was in his sixties and had been scouting for decades.

Paul was there because St. Cloud had a 19 year old player who had come out of nowhere to be a possible first round pick. I was underwhelmed and wanted Paul to explain the buzz to me. He was kind enough to take the time to do just that.

He pointed out that this kid was NHL fast. “Draft speed,” he said. He also, according to Paul, had magic hands. “Draft skill,” he said. But this kid was also NHL sized and for a college player really aggressive. “Draft intensity.”

Paul said the big thing was this kid was safe. He’d play in the NHL. Probably for a lot of games. He’d cover the bet and not make the scout that picked him look bad.

“I like to look out past the end of the player’s career and guess how he’ll be remembered. Twenty years from now, long after he has retired, this kid will be remembered as a useful player, coach able, a great team mate. All in all a consummate professional. There is no danger at all that the team that drafts him will regret it.”

I pointed out the kid didn’t have the offence to play in the NHL and would be at best a fourth line player.

I will never forget what Paul said to me.

“But he will be a hell of a fourth line player.”

The kid didn’t go in the first but did go in the second round. And in 1997-1998 he had his Rookie season. While he was the best rookie on a truly terrible team and did get up to LT’s 1.90/Ev60 nobody could have guessed that as the 2018 season starts he’d be chasing membership in one of hockey’s most exclusive clubs.

Now you can easily look the player up. There is more than enough detail for you to do so. I assume many of you won’t have to look him up. You will know off the top of your head who I am talking about.

My real question is did that 19 year old college player cover his draft ranking? Was my friend Paul right? Twenty two plus years ago were we watching a hell of a fourth line NHL player?

Should we judge that young man we watched in St. Cloud by the company he keeps as he climbs up the mountain to join the Gods of the sport we love?

I was in a keeper league back then. I drafted him.

OriginalPouzar

pts2pndr: I have followed him since the young stars tournament in Penticton. I also was lucky enough to see Hall, Eberle etc. Maksimov has a very quick and accurate release!He is a shoot first player and in ways reminds me of a Mike Bossey?Given the opportunity I believe in his potential. His skating is excellentand speed was equal, to or better than Yamamoto. I think he may of hit the discount bin in the draft due toa certain extent theRussian factor.

I agree with most of this and have stated that the Oilers haven’t had a forward with a shot like Maksimov’s since Jason Arnott – not to mention he loves to shoot and works hard to get open for the shot (like Ovechkin does).

I think he has potential as well – as I said, if he makes it, he’s going to score some goals.

Just not sure if straight to the NHL from junior is going to be the path taken.

With respect to the “Russian factor” – he was born in Canada (although associates with Russia for international play).

pts2pndr

Professor Q: Which is odd, seeing as he’s Canadian.

With predjudice sometimes the name will suffice. It is one of the reasons many immigrants changed the spelling of their names! I don’t understand it and have zero tollerance for it but I have observed enough to know that it is real. Living in Trump land in the sixties, it was not uncommon to hear if it ain’t white it ain’t right!

OriginalPouzar

pts2pndr: I believe it has to do with culture. OurNorth American culture dictates you do not question the coach!The European attitude/culture is more cooperative and refined. Questioning the coach is a more accepted norm. I am not sure I explained this very clearly. I picked up on this while hostingstudents from abroad. I can see where there could be a comunication problem with negative results.

Did Aberg question the coach?

Wilde

Evan Bouchard is an early birthday fellas

Wilde

New Improved Darkness,

The consequences of the horn-tooting dichotomy is like the ocean between post-meal belching practices.

Professor Q

OriginalPouzar: I think you are having some fun but I’m wondering if you do think that Krill has a shot at the NHL in his first year pro? I think we are looking at a couple of years of AHL development time for Maksimov.

If he does “make it”, he’s going to score some goals with that shot – I’m not sure about Calder level amount of goal but, hey, you never know – he’s a driven kid from accounts, looking to improve and work on his game.

Management should staple Safin to him at rookie camp.

I think that could have good results. Young, big, skilled, and from the CHL. Hopefully become contributors in the coming years, of course, as is the hope for all draft picks (or should be).

Maybe, hopefully, they can help each other bond and improve, along with Benson, Yamamoto, and Puljujärvi. Winging it!

Professor Q

pts2pndr: I have followed him since the young stars tournament in Penticton. I also was lucky enough to see Hall, Eberle etc. Maksimov has a very quick and accurate release!He is a shoot first player and in ways reminds me of a Mike Bossey?Given the opportunity I believe in his potential. His skating is excellentand speed was equal, to or better than Yamamoto. I think he may of hit the discount bin in the draft due toa certain extent theRussian factor.

Which is odd, seeing as he’s Canadian.

Scungilli Slushy

Bouchard is a seriously talented player who has a nice toolkit. He has no big maybes. Defensive coverage for his path isn’t a big one to me.

If he was better he wouldn’t have been there at 10. I’m quite excited about his future on his own merits, my worry lies in a team that has given me too many self inflicted injuries. I think the Oilers were very lucky given they were going to spend if he didn’t fall.

New Improved Darkness

Well, sqrt and ! can work together a wee bit. I was wrong.

42 = sqrt(8!*9!)/5!/4!

Don’t ask me how I came up with that. MIND BLOWN.

[edit]

Yes, that was 42—by way of 14,631,321,600. Talk about taking the long way around.

Also:

42 = sqrt(8!*9!)/5!/sqrt(16)!

Unlike the abnormally clustered 4-5-8-9, 5-8-9-16 looks like a perfectly normal set of lottery balls.

VOR

v4ance:
VOR,

Easily covered his draft bet and the bet for his draft class for the organization.My philosophy would be that a draft that turns out over 400 games played or 200 career points would be covering the bet for an entire draft.Anything over that is a complete victory for the amateur procurement group.

*EDIT* Looking back over the data, a better cutoff for games played would be around ~600 GP for a successful draft class.

The problem is this means that long stay 3rd and fourth liners would make a draft acceptable. So by your terms Kyle Brodziak means the 2003 draft was a success for the Oilers.

I am not saying I disagree with you. However, good luck convincing people Kyle Brodziak belonged in the first round in 2003.

Scungilli Slushy

pts2pndr: I believe it has to do with culture. OurNorth American culture dictates you do not question the coach!The European attitude/culture is more cooperative and refined. Questioning the coach is a more accepted norm. I am not sure I explained this very clearly. I picked up on this while hostingstudents from abroad. I can see where there could be a comunication problem with negative results.

The Oilers have a longstanding issue with this. I think especially with anyone from the former USSR.

I also see it as a communication issue. I read somewhere about Babcock’s relationship with Datsyuk. It wasn’t cookie cutter. Babcock accommodated him off the ice in listening to him (granted he was a star) still my impression was that it was often, many times a week say.

I was once told while travelling that Canadians weren’t polite. Quite surprising, it had to do with when we said thanks when ordering at the bar. Small cultural differences create large impressions.

I don’t think with players like Yak, Slepy, Yak 2 the Oilers find a relationship the players value enough. Certainly the player has a role, but so many failures in I have often said the Oilers drafting a ‘Russian ‘ is a wasted pick.

Better luck with Finns, Czechs and Swedes, I believe because the cultural mindset is more similar (temperament and hockey) and the OBC played with those nationalities successfully on the team. Maybe the OBC matters less now but it’s not clear to me yet.

I don’t mean to generalize but I think a pattern is there to see.

pts2pndr

OriginalPouzar: I think you are having some fun but I’m wondering if you do think that Krill has a shot at the NHL in his first year pro? I think we are looking at a couple of years of AHL development time for Maksimov.

If he does “make it”, he’s going to score some goals with that shot – I’m not sure about Calder level amount of goal but, hey, you never know – he’s a driven kid from accounts, looking to improve and work on his game.

Management should staple Safin to him at rookie camp.

I have followed him since the young stars tournament in Penticton. I also was lucky enough to see Hall, Eberle etc. Maksimov has a very quick and accurate release! He is a shoot first player and in ways reminds me of a Mike Bossey? Given the opportunity I believe in his potential. His skating is excellent and speed was equal, to or better than Yamamoto. I think he may of hit the discount bin in the draft due to a certain extent theRussian factor.

New Improved Darkness

From my post yesterday:

42 = 6/sqrt(5-1)*14

I pondered for a while afterwards, and the odds of working the lottery balls to A2LU&E using just +,-,*,/,sqrt—with no rounding or truncation—were probably no better than one in three. I got lucky over the keyboard.

Sometimes this game is also played with factorial. This isn’t normally a huge boon, because mostly factorial makes giant numbers—almost always including at least one singular prime-factor between N/2 and N—so you can’t use (non-truncating) sqrt to crush these huge values down again to a pittance.

But hell’s bells! With this ordinarily impotent Ginsu knife, you get TWO new solutions for this particular challenge:

42 = (14-6-1)!/5! = (6+1^14)!/5!

Yes, I know, 1^14 is not purdy.

Here’s another one that was a near miss (one lottery ball changed slightly):

42 = (sqrt(15-6)!+1)!/5!

Three factorials!!! (Precisely, three non-idempotent factorials!!! Because 1!, 2!, sqrt(0), sqrt(1) are not allowed.)

Sure helps that 42 is the product of consecutive integers. Sure helps that this pair of integers is adjacent to a ball we actually drew.

The near solution deceives the mind for a moment, because:

42 = (sqrt(14-5)!+1)!/(6-1)! // use 1 twice
42 = (sqrt(14-5)!+1)!/5! // use 5 twice, 6 not at all

That was fun.

But writing “McDavid lottery win day #2: the unboxing video, in which you rent a Suncor truck just to cart off the gleefully torn cardboard”—now I can die happy. (Yes, it improved slightly overnight, as curries do.)

Everyone in Edmonton immediately recognized this as a Suncor bitumen truck, right? There are some references one must either get, or pretend to get, to maintain good standing in the local community. I was personally picturing the Komatsu 980E-4. (With a horn-tooting driver, if that matters.)

pts2pndr

Scungilli Slushy: Given how weak Cags possession numbers are it’s baffling Aberg hasn’t been given more time. He’s as fast, heavier, and seems more skilled. The Swede has something going on we don’t see methinks given offense starved Nashville (when they were) didn’t like him. Do teams really value truculence, still, to that level? Is anyone rushing a play because Cags is coming at him?

I believe it has to do with culture. Our North American culture dictates you do not question the coach!The European attitude/culture is more cooperative and refined. Questioning the coach is a more accepted norm. I am not sure I explained this very clearly. I picked up on this while hosting students from abroad. I can see where there could be a comunication problem with negative results.

OriginalPouzar

pts2pndr:
The next calder trophy winner for the Edmonton Oiers will be Maksimov in 19/20! Depending on whenBouchard makes the team, it could be a two race in 19/20 between Bouchard and Maksimov?

I think you are having some fun but I’m wondering if you do think that Krill has a shot at the NHL in his first year pro? I think we are looking at a couple of years of AHL development time for Maksimov.

If he does “make it”, he’s going to score some goals with that shot – I’m not sure about Calder level amount of goal but, hey, you never know – he’s a driven kid from accounts, looking to improve and work on his game.

Management should staple Safin to him at rookie camp.

Georgexs

Lowetide: To be eligible for the award, a player cannot have played more than 25 games in any single preceding season nor in six or more games in each of any two preceding seasons in any major professional league. Beginning in 1990-91, to be eligible for this award a player must not have attained his twenty-sixth birthday by September 15th of the season in which he is eligible.

You’re using the official eligibility criteria then. Cool. BRB.

jm363561

leadfarmer:
OriginalPouzar,

Uggh. A later birthday should never be a positive.Defensemen nature at their own damn pace and nothing you can do will speed that up.Later birthday means one thing and one thing only, a potentially lower ceiling than someone 9 months younger

======

Yes, my view on Bouchard being older than most of his peers is a possible negative. Griffin Reinhart was outstanding in junior but, in hindsight, it was mainly because he was bigger and stronger than his opponents. Same, to a lesser extent, with DNurse. Others have commented on how old Bouchard looks for his age and when his peers catch up physically he may not look quite so impressive – there was a reason he fell down the draft. Hope I am wrong.

Georgexs

How do you define a rookie season? Winchester played 19 games in 05-06 but you have him as a rookie in 06-07, during which he played 59 games.

russ99

Stan Mikita was my Dad’s favorite player. I got to see him play at the stadium as a kid in the very late 70s, he was a shell of himself, my dad would say, but still had style.

RIP, Stosh. What a legend.