Hockey Club vs Oilers, G68 2024-25

by Lowetide
  • On the road to: CAR (Expected 0-0-1) (Actual 1-0-0)
  • At home to: ANA, MTL, DAL (Expected 2-1-0) (Actual 2-1-0)
  • On the road to: BUF, NJD, NYI, NYR (Expected 2-2-0) (Actual 2-2-0)
  • At home to: UTA, WPG, SEA, DAL (Expected 2-2-0) (Actual 0-0-0)
  • On the road to: SEA (Expected 0-0-1) (Actual 0-0-0)
  • At home to: CGY (Expected 1-0-0) (Actual 0-0-0)
  • Overall expected results: 7-5-2, 16 points in 14 games
  • March result: 5-3-0
  • Oilers in 2024-25: 39-24-4, 82 points in 66 games
  • Noah Philp 12, 0-2-2
  • Josh Brown 8, 0-1-1
  • Drake Caggiula 7, 0-1-1
  • Matthew Savoie 4, 0-1-1
  • Cam Dineen 1, 0-0-0

You may also like

5 9 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
95 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tarkus

Prospectoling!

A quartet of OHL’ers beckon if they’re all healthy.

London remains #2 in the CHL Top 10. It probably won’t make them try harder, since they’ve already sewn up the OHL regular season title. It remains to be seen whether O’Reilly will o’return to the lineup after missing the past three.

Meanwhile, Nicholl keeps chugging along with a four-game point streak: an apple a game keeps the goose eggs away.

Once again, Flint has yet to clinch but will do that with a win tonight against bottom-feeding Guelph. (Even a point might suffice, though I’m not willing to go through tie-breaker scenarios ATM.) Day has lost four his last five starts, allowing 21 total goals and ballooning his GAA to 3.09. One wonders whether fatigue is setting in, having played the most minutes (3281) of any OHL tendy by a healthy margin (next is 3061).

Clattenburg has missed the last two games, presumably to injury since he hasn’t been suspended.

Flint (Day, Clattenburg) @ 5 p.m.
London (O’Reilly, Nicholl) @ 5 p.m.

Both times are the same time and are also Smoky Lake time.

Munny 2.0

As part of their phone call today, Putin and Trump discussed a future hockey match between Teams USA and Russia.

I’m not sure Putin would be as magnanimous towards Canada in that regard but it does open the door for a possible fully-stocked Olympic tournament, which is a big damn deal.

Side

Trump will do whatever Putin tells him to do.

hunter1909

lol please

Side

I am surprised you still watch Faux News, hunter.

Munny 2.0

Yet another rhetorical non sequitur

Trump did not make a single concession today. You’re implying he concedes everything to Putin every time they talk. That is thus a false or fake statement, made by you.

Please demonstrate your stance with actual evidence rather than insulting a fellow Lowetidian, for an act you seem to be committing yourself.

Last edited 45 minutes ago by Munny 2.0
Side

Sorry, Munny. I can’t link 190+ sources and 40 years of history showing how Trump and his allies are Russian assets.

Munny 2.0

Which is why there are no more sanctions as of right now…
/sarc

I don’t know how new you are to the world, but in every single case of war in history, the victors dictate the terms. This is no different than all those other times. This war is lost.

Also, history teaches us that it is always the proxies who want to continue and even expand the war even in the face of inevitable defeat. Look at the difficulties the USA had in extricating themselves from Korea and Viet Nam. Were the Americans foolish to start them? Absolutely. But not so foolish as to pour money down a black hole when the outcome was inevitable.

But please, continue to view this issue in the naive, simplistic, rhetorical terms of personalities.

In the meantime… Can we celebrate the possibilty of true best-on-best hockey for the moment? After all, that’s why we’re here. Because sport brings us AND nations closer together.

Side

I don’t know how new you are to the world”

Likewise. Lot of naitivity and uneducated rambling in your response.

Munny 2.0

Please… Cite some examples from my post, something material like I did and which you did not refute… or is rhetoric all you have?

Side

You’re comparing Korea and Vietnam to the war in Ukraine. One of the most significant difference is that American soldiers were boots on the ground in Korea and Vietnam and American lives were lost.

The support the US is providing to Ukraine is largely equipment related. Equipment which the US spent tons of money years ago on and is sitting around collecting dust.

Money isn’t being “poured down a black hole”.

If I bought a dozen tvs, microwaves and mobile phones 8 years ago, am I pouring money down the drain by giving you a spare tv, microwave and mobile phone?

You could argue I poured money down the drain 8 years ago by buying dozens of these things, but it’s also possible I may have needed them even if the possibility is extremely unlikely.

Munny 2.0

You think the support of America is solely in terms of old equipment? Why do you think that?

Side

I never said solely, it’s largely part of the packages.

Munny 2.0

I had solely changed to largely in an edit, so apologies for that.

But… It’s not even close to the largest part. The sanctions alone are a bigger cost to the West than the arms. The USA has also been funding all of their civil society for the past three years, right down to politician and army salaries. Starlink is provided for free. Intelligence, targeting, advising is provided for free, training is provided free, medical supplies, etc… all of which aren’t actually free.

And then there were all the gov financed NGOs also working in Ukraine on top of that direct support.

Even if we granted your denial of pecuniary facts, your argument from analogy (considered the weakest form of argument by the logicians) still doesn’t hold…

So instead of selling your used stuff on eBay, you gave it to me and I decided to take it to the local gravel pit and use it for .22 practice and then came to you the next day and say I need another microwave and TV etc and day after day you kept giving them to me until you were down to the ones you were actually using. Would you hand those over? Because that’s where we’re at. Worse actually because by helping me out, in the real world case, you are putting a whole bunch of people who don’t want me to shoot up microwaves, deeper debt so I can continue on. Kinda nuts.

Note too that if you didn’t want to give me the microwaves, you simply stop. Perhaps talk to me about my microwave problem. Perhaps discourage me from continuing. Could I still demand you keep giving me microwaves? Course not.

Yet you seem to be demanding this of Trump?

Last edited 8 minutes ago by Munny 2.0
Scungilli Slushy

There’s a reason the bad boys on the other side of the world behave when orange man is around. Plus he likes hockey apparently

Chelios is a Dinosaur

In soccer its called a friendly.

Litke 94

Surprised to see Ekholm back already but am hoping this is a good sign and that he must be feeling really good to go. If he is still a bit off, I hope the team and him aren’t afraid to rest a bit more. That Walman trade turned out to be excellent insurance to cover Ekholm during this time.

Curious to see the deployment on the blue line. Walman and Bouchard were very intriguing, wouldn’t mind seeing that again down the line.

OriginalPouzar

Morning skate per Stauff:

J.Skinner-McDavid-Hyman
Perry-Draisaitl-Brown
Podkolzin-RNH-Arvidsson
Janmark-Henrique-Kapanen
Jones-Ryan

Ekholm-Bouchard 
Nurse-Walman
Kulak-Emberson 
Stecher-Klingberg

Pickard
S. Skinner

oil-in-the-blood

Now leave Skinner on 1 for a few games, well unless they really shite the bed. Poor Drai, love Perry though. I hope the viking is fully ready. Lets Go!

OriginalPouzar

I’ve been posting quite a bit the last week about thinking that Nuge might be better these days as a 3C than a top 6 winger and, with him at 3C, it pushes Henrique to 4C which I like as neither Janny nor Kap are centers and those experiments have failed.

Spine the team and they look to be going with it tonight.

I think it looks alot better when Frederick and Kane are in the lineup but I like the thought process.

I would have left Arvy with Skinner and McDavid as it was the trio that have been dynamic in the smallest of samples (like a couple of shifts) but I’ll take this.

Interesting to go back to Pickard so soon – both are coming off strong games. I understand the “reward for Picks”.

oil-in-the-blood

I agree having Arvi up. BUT, who needs more support? RNH at center or 97/hyman, Drai…. RNH imo. RNH is not an ideal 3rd line center or center at all really.
The spine idea is good but as you said, you need the wings to help hold that spine together! So Frederic and Kane should help.

Last edited 3 hours ago by oil-in-the-blood
kinger_OIL

— I’ve been posting for years : glad your on board

— Nuge has made the most out his career by being the right player at the right time deserving to be given the right situation

— RNHv1.0 : got the most minutes on a lousy team playing C joined at hip with the two best players forming the Steve Austins because no one on the team better suited

— RNHv2.0 : 2 C way better than him arrive and he is joined at the hip recast as a winger because no one on the team better suited.

— RNHv3.0: ought to be this teams Guy Carbonneau : stud 3c scores some and plays full game. Because now there should be 4 wingers same or better than him.

doritogrande

I was silently hoping for this C deployment and cannot believe it might actually be a thing. If Kane and Frederic are the replacements for Drai’s wings and the 4th becomes Janmark-Henrique-Brown…amazing.

In years past we had referred to the 97-29-93 deployment as the “unicorn” form. What mythical creature is this 4-deep pivot roster??

anti-Trust Issues

C’MON JEFF PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD

Reja

Keep rotating until we lose. I believe the long playoff couple in the shortest offseason in our franchise history took a toll on a lot of our players and Skinner is one of them. I believe Skinner being the big man that he is has looked a bit worn down physically and mentally this year. The good part is the regular season means squat, I’ll take a fresh peak Skinner in a month from now.

Shamus23

Poor Drai, Brown has absolutely no business in the top 6

OriginalPouzar

From recent games, I think Brown actually plays well with Drai but, at the same time, may be the worst finishes this side of Mattias Janmark.

Connor Brown has been all over the scoring chances with Drai – but can’t finish.

leadfarmer

Hopefully this gets J. Skinner going. Desperately need a guy who can put the puck in the net put some pucks in the net

LMHF#1

Skinner-McDavid-Hyman apparently?

Not what I would’ve gone with, but better than previous.

Crazy Pedestrian

Honestly wanted to see how this line would perform when given more reps to gel together. Question is, how line will KK stick with it? My bet is 5min (sigh…)

oil-in-the-blood

agreed. lol

LMHF#1

Yes.

I’d also like to see the coach acknowledge that Leon’s line is actually line #1 right now and stop stapling Brown/Podkolzin/Perry with him.

Yes Perry is having a great year for his role, but he can’t play enough minutes to be there. The others simply can’t score enough.

dangilitis

My take is Savoie came up at a bad time. When the team collectively is not playing at their best, putting him up on the top 6 and expecting him to help the team win is a tall order.

Hopefully they can get on a heater and put him back in the lineup before end of season. If he’s not a regular next year as part of their plan then that’s a failure

Reja

The kid got a taste he’ll be much more effective his second go around. If him and Leon can figure out the quick give and goes throw in a big skill forward with hands as in Frederic and Bob’s your Uncle.

Louis Levasseur

I didn’t mind some of the bets that were made via free agency or trades: Jones, Kappenin Podzkolin, etc. They all have skill and pedigree and look good/great for short bursts. But they never seem to sustain it, which is why they aren’t with the teams that drafted them. Had Kostin stuck around, would he still be loved, or also be lumped in with the others who “needed a 2nd opinion”?

Scungilli Slushy

Klim Shady is an interesting player, but not interested in two way play. Since moving on he has been with the Wings and Sharks, and in two seasons has managed to get into 86 NHL games. On those teams. It’s too bad because he’s a neat cat and with that size speed and decent skill – which every team wants – he could have a nice contract

LMHF#1

Having the wrong agent with a short term view probably cost the guy at least $10M over the course of his career.

anti-Trust Issues

I dunno man, he turned an 11 goal year into $6M over 3 years, and most teams (particularly the Oilers) aren’t in a hurry to give RFAs significant raises and multi-year deals…

kinger_OIL

— it’s kind of an interesting look back at the moves. Instead of the arvid jeff skinner stretcher brown Henrique etc : keeping more of the the brah holloway mcleod foegele

— Who knows but this team this year doesn’t seem as dynamic fast or quick as before. And again not being able to likely get more games at home as top seed is looking like a fail.

— ek and Walman last 12 months full value to be sure.

cowboy bill

R MacLeod & D Holloway would be much more valued on the roster than J Skinner & V Arvidsson.

Scungilli Slushy

I was ok with McLeod Foegele because of two consecutive playoff stumbles. Holloway was a mistake for sure, Brah should have been dealt because it was clear he wanted out

Arvidsson was a good gamble because he is a player type they lack, but the NMC was boneheaded given there was risk in that he missed nearly a full season and isn’t a big scorer or something

In hindsight Sinner (heh heh gets punished for perceived wrong doings) is exactly the player type they don’t need more of. Big whiff, and JJ apparently hadn’t realized he wasn’t an agent anymore giving a NMC to a bought out player

Jethro Tull

I get Sekera vibes from Walman. In a good way.

Todd Macallan

I was thinking Lubo Visnovsky actually with their similar builds, skating and puck moving abilities. I do like your Sekera comp as well.

Scungilli Slushy

Walman is actually a quite a bit bigger dude

doritogrande

Yaro Spacek, come on down!

Seriously, if Walman can replicate that 06 playoff run…

Scungilli Slushy

Would be great

anti-Trust Issues

I was at both of the games in New York over the weekend. I felt more relieved than happy after the Islanders game, as it felt like the type of game a struggling team can’t find a way to win (dominating first period but getting goalied, taking frequent penalties, giving up the tying goal in the 3rd), but Draisaitl willed the team to victory.

The Rangers game was much stronger and several players had stronger games, but the Oilers are routinely finding themselves in tight games against teams hovering around the playoff line. 5-0 and 3-2 (OT) both count the same in the standings and winning in the NHL is hard, but man it would be nice to see the team’s depth scoring show up tonight and for the team to play a complete 60 minute game for a comfortable win (4-1, 5-2, etc.). The margin for victory is so narrow and without a strong game from Stu that game could have been tied going into the 3rd (or worse).

Also concerning – the Oilers continue to be 3-on-3 OT merchants, with 11/39 wins coming at 3-on-3 (~28%). That’s the highest among contenders by a wide margin, the next closest is Winnipeg (8/46, ~17%). Vegas, Dallas, Colorado, Florida, Carolina, and LA all have 5 or fewer 3-on-3 OT wins. That doesn’t bode well for the Oilers come playoff time, when they can’t just run out 97-29-2 until they put the game away.

Depth was always going to be this team’s issue, particularly after last summer’s moves, but hopefully the Rangers game is a sign of things to come.

Walman has been a great addition, I hope he can sustain through the rest of the season and can keep it up through the playoffs.

Last edited 5 hours ago by anti-Trust Issues
Rafa Nadal

Great point. The Oilers have 26 or 27 regulation wins and the top teams in each conference have between 35-40. Definitely not a good arrow.

anti-Trust Issues

Yeah LA, Minnesota, NYR, and NJ all have more regulation wins than the Oilers, who have one more than Senators…

cowboy bill

Is Skinner the starter against Utah? The other thing is I think once Edmonton get all their players together for the playoffs there’s plenty of depth except in the goaltending department.

anti-Trust Issues

Most playoff teams don’t head into the playoffs with three (let alone two) NHL-starter caliber goalies, and the quality of your starter is much more important than goaltending depth come playoff time. If you have a starter who has locked down the crease and never needs to be pulled for a game/spelled, who needs goalie depth (unless your starter gets Bergeron’d…)

The Oilers have/will have “depth” up front in the sense that they have multiple NHL caliber forwards who will be in the press box on any given night, but the issue is depth scoring not just having depth. Who cares if you have a bunch of 3rd and 4th liners who haven’t scored a goal in twenty games…

cowboy bill

It the injury concern more than anything for me. I just wish there was more insurance after Pickard if Skinner goes down.

anti-Trust Issues

In a perfect world, yes, but if given the choice between a 5th round draft pick and a fringe-NHL level goalie in case of an injury to Skinner/Pickard, I’d choose to keep the draft pick

Scungilli Slushy

I haven’t been posting Power Win data I track because of this, no point. And it’s not great. As Nafa mentioned you can just look at Reg Wins and Losses and it tells the story. It is clear that they are not a dominant team this season. They have a skill/elite advantage over every other team, and that is their hope this time. At least until they fire on all cylinders

anti-Trust Issues

If you are one of the western conference wild card teams, which one of these teams would you most like to face in the 1st round: WPG, DAL, COL, LV, LA, EDM? If Edmonton is heading into the postseason playing at close to their current form, I have to think they’d be the “easiest” or second “easiest” draw out of those six teams. Hook, gold, maul 97/29 to slow them down at even strength, don’t let them score more than 2 PP goals in a game, and outscore win the non-97/29 minutes…

This year’s team prowess in overtime is eerily similar to the 07-08 team’s dominance in the shootout (14-4). Like that team, I don’t think the Oilers have played as well as their record suggests. Not to say they’re as bad as the 07-08 team, but just that that they don’t “feel” like a team that’s on pace to win 48 games …

Last edited 4 hours ago by anti-Trust Issues
Scungilli Slushy

I would pick the Oilers because although they can bring heat the others can’t, as you said there is also a clear plan that can beat them

They weren’t as dominant as folks are remembering last season either. Still had similar issues. The Canucks were close to taking them out, and it took historic special teams to get where they did. Never the easy way

anti-Trust Issues

Yeah, this too, the Oilers were far from dominant last post-season

Reja

Oilers are a veteran team, veteran teams don’t run around like teenage roosters finishing every check for 82 games. They had a short off season cut then some slack. Going back to the Philly series in 1980 we always turn it up a notch in the real season. Add in fuctionsl toughness with Kane-Frederic-Walman-Jones we become hard to play against. You might not have faith in this squad and think they are a easy out to get bounced in the first round but take I’ll take my team to beat anybody this playoff.

anti-Trust Issues

I think we’re past the point we can reasonably attribute the team’s poor form to a short offseason. Also not sure how the 80s teams pre-/post-season performance has any bearing on the current roster, most of whom weren’t even alive the last time the Oilers won a cup.

“Fuctionsl” toughness is great and all, but the issues with the roster probably won’t be solved by Kane/Frederic returning to the lineup, though I am sure they will help.

I wouldn’t say they’re an easy out, but I would not be shocked if LA beat them in a tight first round series. Historically, repeat losers in 1st round rematches eventually find a way to break through against a team that’s had their number, and Edmonton has (arguably) never looked more beatable from the Kings’ perspective.

OriginalPouzar

Ryan Holt stating one of the players the team is without is Derek Ryan. I presume he’s joining the Oilers.

I would not put him in the lineup soon.

OriginalPouzar

Official!

winchester

Whenever a rested Derek Ryan returns, he gives you a hell of a game.

He can’t hold up his performance but if you need a safe reliable center he’ll deliver for 3 games.

OriginalPouzar

I would 100% not put Ekholm and Nurse together.

Ekholm has never been good on the right side (Nashville days) and doesn’t have the mobility for it.

Nurse could probably play his off side but he never has as a pro and why take him out of his natural position when he’s having a nice year and a solid 2LD?

Walman and Kulak are the left shot options to play the right, for me.

daniel

I agree about Nurse-Ekholm. Need a puck mover with mobility on that pairing. Earlier in the season they played Kulak-Nurse for a chunk of games and I thought Nurse looked good on the right side in that period as did Staples. Not certain why they went away from it.

anti-Trust Issues

The Leftorium returns …

cowboy bill

How about that leftrightorium.

cowboy bill

.

Last edited 4 hours ago by cowboy bill
OriginalPouzar

Utah is a fast team with some good going young talent and are in a heck of a battle for a playoff spot.

I expect the Oilers to produce another multi goal win. Impose their will.

cowboy bill

It’s interesting how the Oilers have a difficult time with fast young talented teams.
Anaheim for example. The Hockey club will be a tough challenge.

Rafa Nadal

Good test tonight. “Hockey Club” is young, fast, and close to a playoff spot. Hopefully the Oilers match their intensity!

Brantford Boy

Ekholm-Bouchard have been paired for 66 minutes at five-on-five this year?
Walman-Bouchard?

Last edited 6 hours ago by Brantford Boy
Durag

Have we had the “why isn’t Matt Savoie on the roster” conversation lately?

We have absolute black holes of offence right now in the forms of Janmark, Henrique, Brown, Podkolzin, Kapanen. Arvidsson is maybe finding his way out of the Belanger triangle, but can’t say he’s there yet. Nuge and Hyman are having massively down years, and Hyman is banged up.

We have Savoie on the farm. His calling card is offence, he didn’t look out of place when he got a cup of coffee here. We traded a useful middle 6 player for him, who if he was still around, would have been a top 6 staple this year.

What am I missing?

Durag

Man, but when you’re playing Kapanen on the 1st line, you’re already subscribing to the “needs must” way of thinking. I don’t think 10 games of spot duty is going to kill the kid, but I’m not an NHL exec.

Shamus23

Yes Kappanen on the 1st line is a cardinal sin. He adds that speed, but he seems to miss a lot of chances when they arise.

cowboy bill

They got Kapanen for absolutely nothing off waivers. So what do you expect? He has however contributed up and down the lineup with his versatility.

Shamus23

Yes for sure he should be here. He actually had some chemistry with Leon. He was responsible defensively and is quick and so smart . This kid is going to be the perfect replacement for Nuge in that pp bumper position maybe even by some point next season, especially if Nuge struggles like this season.

90s fan

Management and Coaching decisions get difficult when a team that is supposed to win a division and a Stanley Cup, and never lose more than 1 in a row go into a tailspin.

To me it has to be more than coaches and management continuing to make bad decisions, as they always have. (There was a decade there where management handed a set of rookies the keys to the car). Why don’t they trust this particular rookie at this particular time?

anti-Trust Issues

Management/coaching’s decision to prioritize shot suppression/low-event hockey is really placing a lot more of the offensive burden on 97-29 and I don’t think it’s sustainable. Both are up over 22 minutes a night almost every evening and are playing almost half of the third period. Rookies make mistakes but this team is lacking players who can get to/turn over pucks and put the damn thing in the back of the net, and banking on those two bailing you out and putting the game away every night is not a reasonable way to approach the game.

I hope it doesn’t take an early exit this spring to convince management/coaching to play the damn kid.

cowboy bill

I wish Ryan MacLeod was still here because coaches don’t trust rookies and that is certainly on management.

oil-in-the-blood

same ole same ole with these types of decisions. FRUSTRATING and irritating. I have commented before, savioe needed some games and some rope to really get a shot to see if he is really ready. I have commented before but will again. Savioe needed some games and some rope to really get a shot to see if he is really ready. This is a vet team, they could house a talented rook for 15 games.

Last edited 5 hours ago by oil-in-the-blood
teddyturnbuckle

I agree that they have to get Savoie up and running. The Oilers are going to need all hands on deck this playoffs. We know who Kapanen and the rest of the “couldn’t score on a barn door” forwards are. We don’t need to see more of them before the playoffs.

tapper

Leafs moved on from both Kap and Kling because they got tired of their defensive lapses.

Choosing a player ‘known to have’ defensive lapses over a player you’re ‘worried could have’ defensive lapses seems odd.

SVR

To me, the optimal defence pairings are
Ekholm Bouchard
Nurse Walman
Kulak Emberson

Gives each pair a decent to plus puck mover to help the forwards on break outs. Ekholm and Bouchard are proven as one of the top pairs in the league. Don’t know why they’d mess with it at this point. Nurse and Walman have looked great so far, and Kulak/Emberson should be able to win against bottom comp

Last edited 6 hours ago by SVR
Scungilli Slushy

If Kulak goes playoff Kulak great, Reg season Kulak with Emb isn’t my cup of tea. They don’t control the net front well. I think both need a partner with size as both are shorter and lighter for NHL D (even for a F), and neither are plus puck movers or good at rushing up ice. They are decent but not great. This is taking into account a lot of teams bottom 6 are heavier and physical, a concept Oiler fans haven’t seen since MacT took them to Raleigh

But that is what I expect them to run

Crazy Pedestrian

Not sure I’d consider 6’2” and 192lb small (which they both are). Bouch is 6’3” but weighs the same. Not every player can be a Nurse (6’4” 215lb) or Ekholm (6’5” 225lb).

Scungilli Slushy

They aren’t short but they are light. Bouch is taller which helps bcs reach, but he is also a top end skill player, and people don’t remember but while he isn’t a burner he was the fastest backward skater at his combine for D. Probably why he can gap well and is great at defending entries

Kulak at his best is effective, jury is out with Emb still (I thought he was a good analytic pick up), but together for me it’s not ideal. Lesser skilled D are better when hard to play against and neither are, even though Emb hits. It’s different when you get hit by a guy you outweigh by 10 (by league average weight for a F) 15 or 20 pounds which they both give up to a lot of players

cowboy bill

The good thing is there’s more than one way to optimize the D pairs.

Shamus23

3 in a row sounds nice.
Be nice to see Frederic in the lineup for both Winnipeg and Dallas, but I haven’t heard if he is skating yet. Someone mentioned this week.
So if Ekholm plays with Nurse, does Nurse play the R side?
I would assume they run the same lineup tonight as last game , with possibly Jones out. I liked his game in the last one but he hardly played. He had one shift with McD and looked good on that shift. Not sure the coach is a fan of his game or trusts him yet.
LA lost last night so the Oilers need a big win tonight .

rich tm

In 22-23 for Nashville, Ekholm struggled playing on the right side. He’s not a speed merchant and given this age and the fact that he’s coming back from a core injury, it would not make sense to put him on his right side. One man’s opinion.

90s fan

The entire Pacific Division lost their last game (or two), except that is Edmonton. Somehow, against all reason, the Pacific is still in reach.

Bar_Qu

Maybe easing Ekholm back into the lineup alongside Emberson, which would let them limit his minutes could work. Then Nurse Bouchard, Kulak Walman would run in the top 4. Again, this is if they need to limit Ekholm as he returns. Otherwise I would do what you suggest.

Scungilli Slushy

Frederic is skating I heard. Knoblauch sucks at building the team because he doesn’t engage all of them. He is too conservative

It’s not all on him because some of these forwards are just not doing anything. Many are NHL tweeners – not big, not fast, no offense, no physicality. Sometimes not defensive either. But he also hasn’t been able to lead them to a better place

It reminds me of Lowe doing better when he had more restrictions. The team played better than after KK had a training camp and could fully implement what he wanted. If Maurice Evason or Hynes was the coach it would be somewhat different, at least in engagement

cowboy bill

There is evidence that they are ramping up the physicality as they approach the playoffs. Can’t wait to see Freddy in Oiler silks.

95
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x