Forever, For Always, For Certain

by Lowetide

You may also like

4.3 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dee Dee

If you predict the surprise was it REALLY a surprise?

anonymous

I don’t agree on Mcdavid. If he was to come out and say he thinks that Edmonton can’t win, bias NHL and officiating. I would accept it.

Right now I think he’s selfish. He was part of the problem in the final. I trade him right now. He’s gone first blip the team has. Wish we’d got Crosby instead. At least he has loyalty. Screw Mcdavid. Hope he’s traded and never wins a thing.

winchester

In regard to Ekholms comments on his contract situation:

I find this very bothersome, and perhaps it is due to the larger contract (McDavid) issue but perhaps not.

Just because the “you have to take care of the big boys first” is no reason that a conversation does not take place with Ekholm. He assumes “then we’ll talk” Well its September and there is zero reason that there has not been significant communication.

Dereck Ryan – not commenting on being sent to AHL but how it was managed. this is usually about communication

Dylan Holloway – uncertainty that Oilers were not in discussion with him led to signing the offer sheet

No discussion with Corey Perry

Trading Evander Kane with Coffey openly criticizing the trade

Jackson signing Arvi and Skinner on an opportunity whim

Nobody knows who or why Josh Brown was signed

Connor McDavid?

Is there a rift somewhere?

Tarkus

So…the Oilers have not actually relinquished the rights to Copponi, Määttä, Münzenberger and Mazura just yet, even though the August 15 deadline has come and gone.

In order to become UFA’s, college players have to submit paperwork to the NHL saying they’ve either graduated or are no longer enrolled in college. Because none of the four have yet done so–and more than a dozen others–they remain Oilers property.

Even though the linked article is more than a couple weeks old, Puckpedia still shows all four players on the Oilers’ reserve list.

OriginalPouzar

Ekholm has been on the ice for practice skates and early intel is no health issues.

Neither Bouch nor Nuge have been on the ice in Edmonton yet (or Hyman, of course).

OriginalPouzar

Gregor:

“Absolutely I want to stay in Edmonton, but I know you have to take care of the big boys first. Once he (McDavid) gets done I’m sure we will talk. I’m getting up there (age) but I know what I bring,” Ekholm on entering the final year of his deal.

OriginalPouzar

Ek says he had a torn abductor – kind of alluded to just trying to survive out there in the SCF (they shouldn’t have played him is my thought).

He feels great now – on ice with guys again today.

I think he can go back to “certain”.

Scungilli Slushy

Agreed on not playing him. They do this over and over. A healthier player is almost always a better bet than a guy seriously limited. If you don’t trust your bench get one you do

DBO

So Friedman’s comments today, Spectors article and Rishaug’s interview are interesting to say the least on McDavid.

Is this as simple as McDavid waiting to see how good Savoie, Howard are this season? And seeing how Stu responds as goalie to start with new coach? Less about another move or two, and more about seeing if the young guys make him a believer that they’ll be big contributors over the next 5 years.

he has repeatedly said long term winning is key. he clearly said he believes they have best shot to win this year. So he won’t waive his no move. McDavid will be here this season More if he would be open to sign and trade in off season.

Painfully I don’t expect him to sign until just before Christmas. When he sees how the younger guys respond and how Stu calms the net, and if they struggle out of the gate he will see what Bowman does to address it (with younger players he believes can help him win multiple cups over his next contract)

Bar_Qu

I felt the 32 thoughts pod was very helpful. 97 wants to win, wants an organization that will find every way to reach that goal and will provide the foundation to make it happen. Between that and what he said yesterday, I think you are right. The team needs to come out of the gate strong and give him reason to believe there is sustain there (no selling the future for the present this year).
I think the playoff cap actually helps the Oilers significantly. It means there is no waiting for a solution in March, but ensuring the best team is iced in October. Early trades will happen from smart teams recognizing the value of cap accrual is nil for playoff bound teams. It might make it easier to offload big contracts to teams outside the race however.

OriginalPouzar

McDavid said himself there is nothing he needs to see from management as far as the team goes.

Brantford Boy

Been meaning to post regarding your comments on long term winning for a few weeks. I’ve been following the 32 teams links on the NHL app since early August. Most all the good teams with great players speak of “these athletes are wired differently” and “nobody sees the efforts behind the cameras” and of course “they just want to win”. THIS is the most significant factor for a McDavid extension. He wants to win and cement his legacy. He wants to do it with the Oilers. Management needs to prove that they are capable of providing his biggest dream into reality. It seems like a cliche but it’s the only factor. Godspeed Bowman, make it so.

dcsj

I get that Oilers management has been – shall we say – “spotty” through most of McDavid’s years, so I can understand the frustration and caution. But still, these comments don’t strike me as “team first.” Should a team captain talk/think that way?

kinger_OIL

— yeah I agree it’s not really “captainy” when your in camp and your clearly : “I’m not sure if I’m all in besides wanting to win the cup for sure this year”.

Fibonacci

That raises the question of what the Oilers would/could do if Savoie and Howard are not immediately impactful and Skinner continues to be Skinner.

With virtually no cap space and a dearth of trade assets, how could that be rectified?

OriginalPouzar

Stauff alluded to expecting the Oilers to add on the waiver wire in early October – they were talking about goaltending when he said that.

OriginalPouzar

A caller alluded to 2 X $1.25MM for Podz and Stauff said no chance. At least $500K higher. I agree. Low 2’s for term. His floor is set.

A call alluded to 2 X $4MM for Ek and Stuff suggested Overhardt likely things he can get 3 years for Ek – even at 36. That one scares me.

kinger_OIL

— shoot I had what I thought was good post about contract status stuck in “spam”

Last edited 3 hours ago by kinger_OIL
Traveller

It is possible, if you used the owners name, it got caught by the filter. The filter isn’t always consistent since it is in a couple of your posts below but I have had posts held up for review but if I copy and repost with the name changed to “the owner” instead of his actual name it goes through no issues.

it really makes no sense that his name is still on the list for unacceptable words.

kinger_OIL

— cMd has earned the right to decide

— managements strategy that “we will let him decide” is either a smoke screen or incompetence or a way to deflect what they know will occur.

— Managements job is to convince our captain that he ought to sign for max 8 years as that’s the most desirable outcome for the franchise.

— I think they are giving themselves an out by telegraphing “hey he gets to decide”.

1) It’s the most desirable outcome for the franchise because of what 8 years means for the valuation of the enterprise

2) it’s the most desirable outcome for the franchise because as the cap grows they will have a longer competitive window as his contact becomes a relative bargain.

— So I get that projecting “we will give him all the time he needs” is being pitched as a being the nice guy. But that’s not how business works.

— Max term is best result for the franchise owner throws kitchen sink to make it happen.

— I get media gets fed and fans listen to an alternative scenario

— From Conners perspective I get why he doesn’t want to commit for 8 years and I won’t blame if he signs for less.

— I will however blame the organization more and won’t buy the “we have to respect his choice”.

— It would be a fail and sub optimal by the organization if he signs for less than 8 years

— no verbiage or recasting if he signs shorter changes reality that organization loses if no max.

— The owner isn’t going to be happy with a “well he got to decide”. The owner wants what’s best for him. In this case both the owner and fans are aligned : 8 years is best.

We wait

Last edited 3 hours ago by kinger_OIL
kinger_OIL

— Im prepared to be disappointed. And agree it’s been telegraphed.

— Main point is it’s a fail full stop by the organization. Looking at it through the business lense as Katz would : recognize that it’s a failure no matter how it gets pitched or deflected by the current management team.

— Not signing 8 years is a tell. One that many have opined on.

— I don’t know what I do t know but I do know that if I was him I can see why he’s not decided.

— I know what I need to do but I don’t know if I have the strength to do it”

kinger_OIL

— I also am just fascinated by this topic as the financial implications and valuation as well as the relationship between management ownership and players is in full display.

— Hockey teams are akin to boutique family owned businesses: so there is a lot at stake and a lot of its future as we emerged from the DoD

kinger_OIL

— stuff stuck in “spam”. I didn’t use any bad words : promise !

cowboy bill

I think the organization just doesn’t want to push him away. He’s a keeper. It may be as simple as that.

kinger_OIL

— yeah but push hard for max. I’m sure behind scenes that’s what Katz is doing. He not just going to defer to this to management to say “well we respect him and his decision” IMO

— 8 years is worth a ton more to the owner

TravisTDK

Unfortunately for management, when you’re negotiating with the best player in the league, the ball is not in your court.

He has 31 other teams that are happily willing to sign him if he were to let them, the management has 1 player to sign, they aren’t able to leverage the “there are multiple players similar to you, we want you but you better make a decision quick because we will sign someone else” scenario.

Mcdavid gets all the time he wants because he is in control. When you are 1 of 1, you have 100% leverage.

Melman

I understand that the org would like to sign him for 8 years, but if he doesn’t want to sign any 8 offer period, no matter the offer or structure, how can that be their fault?

kinger_OIL

— “it’s not my fault” is what they are pitching

— if the oilers were better run for the last 10 years of his tenure there would not be a hesitation to resign (that’s why FLA resigns all their guys who can’t wait to put pen to paper)

— that’s why the owner would be involved: he’s not going to accept the “we will wait” narrative when it’s his equity valuation. The fans seem to be comfortable with this. But the owner behind scenes isn’t being idle waiting to hear back IMO

— Sure he still might not sign long term.

Cape Breton Oilers 4EVR

Can you imagine the recruiting (tampering) that would go on in the Team Canada dressing room if McDavid is not signed by the Olympics?

LMHF#1

I’m much more concerned about a post-Olympic let down than that.

The Oilers have unfortunately let winning what I’ll describe as “winning their Cup” lead to disappointment.

Beating the Flames. Making the Finals the first time. Let downs after both.

And after Four Nations last year as well.

McDavid cares about the Olympics…and unless you are a true great, having two big prizes on your radar for one year with that much responsibility can be a real test.

We’ll see what he’s made of.

kinger_OIL

— I’m totally in the minority on this but Men’s Olympic Hockey doesn’t do it for me

— It takes away from the athletes in other sports where the Olympics truly is what they trained for all their sporting life

— The Olympics is a gangster criminal racket that generates so much additional money with the hockey games

— But kudos to so many of the players who clearly value the opportunity to represent their country : for no money (and help the IOC get richer off their backs).

— And I get why the NHL would want to have Hockey shine on an international presence that they don’t have like say NFL or NBA

Last edited 1 hour ago by kinger_OIL
godot10

Everyone will be recruiting Crosby too.

36
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x