Blackhawks at Oilers, G76 2025-26

by lowetideedm
Image by Fawn Mitchell

You may also like

3.9 11 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

270 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
OriginalPouzar

Akey back in lineup and Brown out.

Howard with Hamblin and Griffith.
Jarventie with Marjala and Hutson.
Clatt 4LW.
Pickard starts.

Last edited 5 days ago by OriginalPouzar
OriginalPouzar

Knob was on with Jim Rome today and Rome brings up Drai by saying “out with a lower back injury” and they chatted from there. I wonder if Rome meant to say Lower Body and not Lower Back?

Reach Advantage

Curlock says the new college signing, Michaels, potential is 4C

He is defensively responsible

Needs to work on his skating but his issues are not structural so there is hope

Stauffer asked, could you see the future as Samanski as 3C and him as 4C?

Curlock said, Samanski for sure but was a lot less sure about Michael as 4C

OriginalPouzar

Ekholm played 4 minutes less than another other D at 5 on 5.

Did they note anything on the broadcast? Did he leave the game for a bit and I didn’t notice?

Reach Advantage

I didn’t hear or see anything
I believe he has been playing less since he was a game time decision a few games ago with an illness
No idea if there is something still lingering

OriginalPouzar

I’ve been told (but have not fact checked) that he only played two shifts in the 2nd period (but was back for 8 shifts in the 3rd period).

Reach Advantage

oh-oh

Last edited 6 days ago by Reach Advantage
OriginalPouzar

I do want to win the division but, truth be told, with their +27 goal differential and 30 regulation wins, Utah is simply better than Vegas/LA. I do think the Oilers should have no real issue in a playoff series against Utah but they are a tougher opponent than LA/VEG.

Reach Advantage

One of the other things that concerns me about facing Utah (and I too am confident that we can win vs them) is that it is the first time in the playoffs in the new city.

Remember Vegas went to the final in their first season.
It helped that franchise get established with diehard fans

I don’t trust Bettman

Reja

The Utah goaltending is a crapshoot I like our chances with a super motivated Ingram facing his old team especially when they’re paying half his salary .

blackadder

Vegas is the better team, its just their goaltending has been failing them. If Hill or Hart get their games together Vegas would be, I think, the tougher out. It’s a big if, of course.

Utah has a really good, mobile defense group and Vemelka has been giving them great goaltending over the last month especially. But they don’t have any players who are as good as Marner, Stone or Eichel.

mirnovsvodka

It’s all about Peaking.

Reja

I foresee some tasty Peking Duck on our playoff menu.

xerburt

And some Shark Fin Soup?

TheGreatBigMac

and Streaking

Reja

Carter Hart must be hurting for cash as he must be the only goalie in the league without having a paint job on his mask.

Reach Advantage

Line of Henrique – Jones – Samanski

zero offensive zone shift starts 5v5

100% xGF%

1-0 Goals

clap clap clap

Reja

Samanski-Jones 2 bigger bodies opening up ice for Henrique who’s always had quick hands.

DevilsLettuce

Im never getting the stand down orders.

Reja

Logan Stanley flopped like fish after a hit from a 170 pound Archie. I can’t stand that wuss reminds me off Neil Sheehy

OriginalPouzar

I don’t know what this has to do anything but Josh Archibald took out his legs with a very dirty play.

Lenny

Connor Murphy on his time in YEG

it’s been awesome. It’s a team id been eyeing for a while

SIGN THE MAN
Dublin Ohio Laddy Smid

Ranford.85

Sign yes, dollar and years dependant. No NMC whatsoever.

OriginalPouzar

My thought is $4MM or under for 4 years max then I remember that Ceci signed 4 X $4.5MM……

Lewis Grant

And it’s a very thin UFA class.

Gotta offer him a lowball deal before late June and hope he takes it. Hopefully late June is very shortly after our season ends.

LMHF#1

No NMC. 2 years max. Find a young guy instead if at all possible.

Reja

Brown nosing his old boss for his retirement contract.

v4ance

I have to give Jarry props for a great game. I’ve been critical of his play but he stoned the Hawks on some dangerous one on one chances.

Some leaky defence this game. I hope they learn lessons from this match and tighten it back up for the next match against the Kniggits who say “Veee”

OriginalPouzar

He was very solid tonight – some really strong saves and he looked good doing it.

We were close to back to back shutouts with one each although when that happened earlier in the year, it turned very bad shortly after so maybe a good thing it didn’t.

v4ance

5 games! We’re streaking!

OriginalPouzar

A few too many open looks but the shot suppression is real and it’s spectacular.

Reja

2 points is all that matters if we can get both goalies in the right frame of mind for the playoffs then Bob’s are Uncle.

cowboy bill

It was bad luck they didn’t get Jarry a shutout.

OriginalPouzar

True but they also had some good luck with the Hawks missing the net on some point blank attempts.

rev.hans

Sooooo many misses.

Tarkus

Podz from the ex-Hawks
To clinch a 3-1 vict’ry
Oilers tied with Ducks

Ice Sage

Nice apple for Dickinson vs his exes.
Not a Picasso but they got ‘er dun.

rich tm

A win is a win. Works for me.

BornInAGretzkyJersey

PodzGoalsIn

Gerta Rauss

Podzilla puts this thing to bed

Fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive..!!!!

dsr29

So sloppy in the 3rd

SKOilerFan

97 needs to be better there in D zone.

Reach Advantage

It’s funny to see teams give up their forecheck when Walman gets the puck in the dzone.

usuallyunusual

He definitely has his mobility back.

rich tm

Could sense that coming. Team is back to playing loose defensively in this period.

Reach Advantage

Look at this fourth line.
I think they’ve played the whole game in the offensive zone

Whaler Slamamoto

Nashville doing the business so far!

Whaler Slamamoto

Also flames and kraken!

DexandRuby

Has Mangiapani even gone to Chicago yet? Or is he still in transit?

Last edited 6 days ago by DexandRuby
Tarkus

He’s injured but traveling with the team on this roadie.

Last edited 6 days ago by Tarkus
GaetanHaasWasAMediocreHockeyPlayer

Utterly absurd call.

Are they saying the best player in the world is not in possession of the puck in that scenario? Then who is? No one? You cannot put yourself offside!

OriginalPouzar

I said that was offside in real time before the goal was scored. They only showed one replay at the arena but he lost control. That was offside.

cowboy bill

The puck was on his stick the whole time. He had it under control. Terrible call. The refs having mercy on the Hawks.

Last edited 6 days ago by cowboy bill
OriginalPouzar

The puck was definitely not on his stick when he crossed the line and it was because he lost control.

cowboy bill

It’s difficult to truly understand the rule. But just because the puck isn’t on his stick doesn’t mean he’s not in control of the puck. The call truly could have gone either way and it was a risky review for the Hawks to make. The officials gave them a break.

OriginalPouzar

I don’t think its difficult to understand the rule and, while I dod agree that just because the puck isn’t on his stick does not mean he is not in control, in this case, I think he did mishandle/bobble the puck and lost control.

oil2000

Can you explain how he lost control? I only saw one replay. All i could see was the puck not physically on his stick. Was it more than just that?

usuallyunusual

The puck not on his stick is assumed as no control. Same as makar not having control entering the zone without the puck on his stick to allow a teammate to clear.
Even though in both cases the player was in control. Just not by the wording of the rule.

Last edited 6 days ago by usuallyunusual
oil2000

I dont believe thats true

oil2000

Control in the nhl rule book is defined as:

“The act of propelling the puck with the
stick, hand or feet. Control of the puck is
not lost when contact with the puck is
made by an opponent, the boards or the
net, provided the player in control of the
puck continues propelling the puck.”

oil2000

Also, two completely different situations. Makar wasnt about control. It was about physically touching the puck only.

usuallyunusual

Not to split hairs. But control of the puck was in question in both situations. Makar purposely pulled his stick away from the puck to uncontrol the puck. …so no control by the nhl interpretation.

Same as mcdavid not having the puck on his stick while crossing the blue. Again by nhl interpretation not mine.

I believe in both instances both players had control and do not like that it’s left up to a replay to determine control. I believe control should not be reviewable and solely left up to human ( linesman) opinion.

OriginalPouzar

In my opinion (and presumably in the opinion of whoever made the replay decision), McDavid lost control of the puck as he crossed the blueline – it was a bobble/mishandle to my eye.

usuallyunusual

I agree the nhl determined it was not in control by mcdavid. Same determination as with makar…. I’d like in both cases the determination be made by the linesmen and not reviewable.

OriginalPouzar

The Makar determination notwithstanding, I think it was the right call tonight as, at least to me, McDavid mishandled that puck causing an off side. He was also mishandling the puck all night long, as an aside.

oil2000

No. He may still have had control. Control didnt matter in that case. He just wasnt touching it.

Last edited 6 days ago by oil2000
usuallyunusual

Agreed. But nhl does not.

oil2000

I just looked this all up, re: makar, etc. i stand corrected. they say Makar did not have control “because he wasnt touching the puck”, which is crazy to me. I fully agree that play was onside, but only because he wasnt touching the puck, not because he “lost control”. This league man.

OriginalPouzar

I don’t think McDavid had control – I think he clearly lost it.

I don’t think Makar had control either but I don’t know what was in his head – tonight was much more clear – in my opinion.

OriginalPouzar

I’m not sure what there is to explain – its just what I saw (in real time and on the one replay they showed in the arena) – it wasn’t on his stick as he crossed because he bobbled it//lost control.

oil2000

That answers my question perfectly. If you say he bobbled it (i couldnt really figure that out on the replay i saw), then the call makes much more sense in my mind.

GaetanHaasWasAMediocreHockeyPlayer

He slows the pass down, in control before the line, in clear possession, enters backwards, then touches the puck again.

Is control merely the puck on your stick?

Because Makar did not. And how many goals in history would be eliminated if the puck was not on the stick of player entering the zone?

Watch the play in real time. When precisely does Connor lose possession?

It’s crazy to me that offside can be slowed down to make a ruling. The game is not played in slow-mo! If it cannot be determined within 30 second or less in real time, then it should be determined inconclusive.

Last edited 6 days ago by GaetanHaasWasAMediocreHockeyPlayer
OriginalPouzar

I think he lost control (it was not on his stick and it was not intentional) before he crossed the line.

Reach Advantage

That’s not an easy pass to execute by McDavid

Last edited 6 days ago by Reach Advantage
Reach Advantage

offside ach

SVR

That’s a BS call. He had control

LMHF#1

They don’t make up fake rules on the fly for the Oilers like they do for some other teams.

Moonlight

The Makar Rule for instance

Reach Advantage

Ooooh that’s a goal scorers goal right there

Sierra

Another messy skating backwards offside situation.

LMHF#1

Cale Makar, anyone?

danny

Makar was different he put the puck across the blueline while his teammate was offside, and supposedly didn’t touch the puck until after that player tagged up

oil2000

McLeod right up there with celebrini in his 19 year old season.

Lenny

What Savvy is doing at even strength is crazy

since Feb 15 he is 2.95 pts/60 at 5v5

24th in the league

other notables
my boy Sam Carrick at 2.81
Viktor Arvidsson at 4.59
Dylan Holloway 3.56
Taylor Hall 3.02

Gaz Gazzersson

2avoie! 🚨🚨

Gaz Gazzersson

Why you hate goals, NHL?

Side

Easily replaceable, dime a dozen Savoie with 2 goals tonight.

Paulie

Whose job is Savio taking?

BornInAGretzkyJersey

Savvy’s Seconds!

oil2000

Awful trade

Gerta Rauss

Savoie is just money these days

Money

Last edited 6 days ago by Gerta Rauss
Gerta Rauss

…and offside no goal

SVR

Bad habits creeping in on the pp. Good save Jarry

Tarkus

That’s gold, Jarry! Gold!

BornInAGretzkyJersey

Just remember, Soup is going to be the meal until 2029/30.

I think I’m going to puke. Puke? Puke is a funny word!

Reach Advantage

Frederic’s speed draws a penalty?!

Reach Advantage

Jones is playing such a great 4th line game right now
Great on the forecheck, he’s getting so many puck retrievals. Keeping plays alive. Must be why coach is playing Bouch – Ek with that line

Gaz Gazzersson

MATTY BANKSHOT!

fishman

Lucky bounce but they don’t say how, just how many!!

oil2000

Brutal trade.

Reach Advantage

Roslovic with the rare (for him) primary assist

LateNightOilFan

Yay Henrique! I’m listening on the radio, it was a very happy description by Cam.

Gaz Gazzersson

REBOUND RICO! 🚨

BornInAGretzkyJersey

Don’t sweat the Henrique!

Unless you somehow let him get a BREAKAWAY, then sweat all the details haha

fishman

Henry off the schneid!

270
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x