When Sinatra sings against Nelson Riddle’s strings

by Lowetide

Although it seems impossible, there are prospects who attend rookie camp and make the NHL team in the same season. All the time.

THE ATHLETIC!

The Athletic Edmonton features a fabulous cluster of stories (some linked below, some on the site). Great perspective from a ridiculous group of writers and analysts. Proud to be part of the group, take advantage of the incredible Labor Day Weekend offer here!

  • New Lowetide: Connor McDavid’s 2019-20: Pushing for 50 goals while Dave Tippett loads up the Oilers’ top line
  • New Lowetide: Estimating reasonable expectations for the 2019-20 Edmonton Oilers: A difficult journey
  • New Jonathan Willis: How much money will Darnell Nurse make on his next NHL contract?
  • New Lowetide: Ken Holland’s measured summer leaves Oilers outside playoffs.
  • New Jonathan Willis: Can Mikko Koskinen be a quality starter for Oilers in 2019-20?
  • New Lowetide: The 2019-20 Oilers and value contracts: A period of transition
  • New Corey Pronman: Oilers No. 9 farm system.
  • New Jonathan Willis: Jesse Puljujarvi signs one-year deal in Finland, dashing hopes he would return to the Oilers
  • Lowetide: Jay Woodcroft joins Claude Julien and Todd Nelson as key coaches in Oilers prospect development
  • Lowetide: Is Riley Sheahan an ideal fit for the Oilers as their No. 3 centre?
  • Lowetide: Oilers coach Dave Tippett might have to take drastic action in order to find a second outscoring line in 2019-20
  • Lowetide: Oilers end summer still shy on first-shot scoring wingers
  • Lowetide: Connor McDavid and optimal line chemistry: The Oilers need to abandon enforcer fixation and add a skill winger
  • Lowetide: Jesse Puljujarvi’s biggest hurdles: Bad timing and the indifference of the Oilers.
  • Lowetide: Projecting the Oilers 2019-20 Opening Night Lineup
  • Daniel Nugent-Bowman: Q&A: Dave Tippett on rounding out his coaching staff, fixing Oilers’ special teams and using Connor McDavid
  • Daniel Nugent-Bowman: What the 2021-22 Oilers might look like after their steady build toward contender status
  • Lowetide: Joel Persson is ideally situated to win an opening night roster spot with the Oilers
  • Jonathan Willis: Projecting the Oilers’ opening night lineup, line combinations and more.
  • Lowetide: Oilers’ acquisition of James Neal could add badly needed scoring to the top two lines.
  • Daniel Nugent-Bowman: Ken Holland puts his stamp on the Oilers with first big move in Lucic-Neal trade
  • Jonathan Willis: Ken Holland ends an ugly situation for the Oilers by trading Milan Lucic for James Neal
  • Lowetide: Oilers top 20 prospects summer 2019.

This blog annually lists the rookies for camp and then a large group of people say “no one from this list will play in the NHL this season” and we bat that back and forth. Here are the men who made the Young Stars roster over the last several years and then played in the NHL same season:

2018: Evan Bouchard, Caleb Jones, Joe Gambardella, Cooper Marody, Kailer Yamamoto

2017: Kailer Yamamoto, Ethan Bear

2016: Jesse Puljujarvi, Matt Benning, Drake Caggiula

2015: Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl, Darnell Nurse, Anton Slepyshev

2014: Leon Draisaitl, Darnell Nurse, Laurent Brossoit, Bogdan Yakimov, Jordan Oesterle, David Musil

2013: Oscar Klefbom, Martin Marincin

2011: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins

Ken Holland and Dave Tippett may not employ Bouchard and the rest but my guess is that at least one of these men finds their way to the NHL this season:

Goalies (3): Stuart Skinner, Olivier Rodrigue, Dylan Wells. 

Left Defense (4): Jaxon Bellamy, Ethan Cap, Brendan De Jong, Dmitri Samorukov.

Right Defense (3): Evan Bouchard, Logan Day, Vincent Desharnais.

Center (4): Cameron Hebig, Steve Iacobellis, Cooper Marody, Ryan McLeod. 

Left Wing (5): Tyler Benson, Liam Keeler, Beau Starrett, Jakub Stukel, Nolan Vesey.

Right Wing (4): Raphael Lavoie, Kirill Maksimov, Ostap Safin, Kailer Yamamoto. 

Price for Puljujarvi

If the Oilers trade JP before the start of the season, and I think it’s a distant bell, a young AHL plug and play in his entry deal would seem to be an acceptable return. Here are some candidates and their AHL numbers from a year ago:

Alex Barre-Boulet. He is 22, his rookie AHL season (at 21) saw him deliver 74, 34-34-68 (.92). He is quick and skilled, plays RW most of the time according to reports.

Jordan Kyrou. He would be a very good target. Righty forward, he is 21 and last year (at 20) scored 47, 16-27-43 (.92). Impressive skater, great skill.

Denis Gurianov. He is 22 and last year (21) was his second AHL season. He was 57, 20-28-48 (.84), and has size, skill and a scorer’s touch. Fine skater.

Taylor Raddysh. He is 21, he was 20 as a rookie and posted 70, 18-28-46 (.66) as a rookie. Big winger is a scorer, he played on McDavid’s Erie Otters in 2014-15.

Eeli Tolvanen. He is 20, played at 19 as an AHL rookie in 2018-19. Posted 58, 15-20-35 (.60) and may be regarded as having a more substantial future than Puljujarvi.

Julien Gauthier. He is 21, he was 20 in his second season (October 15 birthday) last year. Posted 75, 27-14-41 (.55) in year two in the AHL. Corey Pronman’s report on him in the recent Hurricanes prospect ranking is legit encouraging but Gauthier isn’t full value for JP.

You may also like

0 0 votes
Article Rating
142 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ryan

Georgexs,

There’s a lot to unpack here and I have to go to work. 🙂

First, my comment about producing at 5v5 being the hardest aspect of the game is something I’ve gleaned from reading this blog. While I’m a believer of that concept, it was never my idea.

You’ve made a point in a sense. Points per 60 can definitely look silly if you’re using an arbitrary 10 game cut off. A guy like Zykov can go on a run and score 7 points in 10 games in limited minutes, but you’re never going to see a Zykov play and tear the cover off the ball for 22 minutes per game during a 10 game stretch. He’s never going to see the ice that much nor be able to play those minutes effectively.

Clearly, there’s a requisite sample size required if you’re using points/60. It’s also important to look at that scoring rate in the context of other seasons. I’ll concede to you that points/60 is a terrible stat over a small sample size. I’ll also concede that there’s something to be said of producing at a point rate per 60 for 10 minutes per game vs 17 minutes plus.

On the same token, points per game can suffer from its own issues. On poor teams with lack of depth, players like Chiasson can play up the lineup both at evens on the first power-play units thereby inflating their minutes at evens at PP and inflating their points per game.

The best players in the game play the most minutes on their teams and get the most powerplay minutes. That’s going to show up in points / game. It also gives a large sample size which I’ve acknowledged.

In my previous comment, I mentioned something to the point of needing to separate out the ‘fluke years’ which at first glance, you’ve got a long list of players with “fluke years” reflected in their points/60 from 10 game or more samples.

From a forecasting perspective, given that points/game also incorporates the valuable toi/g info while points/60 does not, I can agree that it’s a more useful stat.

Gotta run.

ArmchairGM

If Puljujarvi has a good season, would Kaprizov be a good trade target? His KHL contract ends April 30, 2020. Thoughts?

stephen sheps

Glovjuice,

Of course I used the “I’m not sure that means what you think it means” line as a joke, calling back to the old timey poster “Steve Smith” who used it often back in the day. OP is gonna do his thing, I’ll do mine. We’ll continue rarely engaging with each other and call it a day.

Jaxon

Here is the top 30 5v5 Pts/GP

Player 5v5 Pts/GP
Nikita Kucherov 0.8414634146
Connor McDavid 0.8205128205
Patrick Kane 0.8148148148
Sidney Crosby 0.7721518987
Artemi Panarin 0.746835443
John Tavares 0.7317073171
Johnny Gaudreau 0.7317073171
Leon Draisaitl 0.7195121951
Mitchell Marner 0.7073170732
Jake Guentzel 0.6951219512
Auston Matthews 0.6911764706
Brayden Point 0.6582278481
Max Domi 0.6463414634
Taylor Hall 0.6363636364
Sean Monahan 0.6282051282
Matt Duchene 0.6164383562
Jack Eichel 0.6103896104
Claude Giroux 0.6097560976
Brad Marchand 0.6075949367
Alex Ovechkin 0.6049382716
Timo Meier 0.6025641026
Paul Stastny 0.6
David Pastrnak 0.5909090909
Evgeni Malkin 0.5882352941
Viktor Arvidsson 0.5862068966
Aleksander Barkov 0.5853658537
Mark Stone 0.5844155844
David Krejci 0.5802469136
Jonathan Huberdeau 0.5731707317
Nathan MacKinnon 0.5731707317

Here is top 30 5v5 Pts/60 of players with Top line minutes thus facing top competition:
Player 5v5 Pts/60
Nikita Kucherov 3.365899267
Sidney Crosby 2.920368105
Mitchell Marner 2.869945295
John Tavares 2.868906893
Johnny Gaudreau 2.844388259
Connor McDavid 2.818038381
Max Domi 2.804109166
Artemi Panarin 2.799377916
Patrick Kane 2.798850304
Auston Matthews 2.76434453
Brayden Point 2.749787009
Jake Guentzel 2.670518877
Brad Marchand 2.657071686
Timo Meier 2.584705631
Sean Monahan 2.579513051
Leon Draisaitl 2.569033709
Taylor Hall 2.536997886
Viktor Arvidsson 2.522723057
Paul Stastny 2.519655647
David Krejci 2.472708142
David Pastrnak 2.468962121
Evgeny Kuznetsov 2.46555706
Matt Duchene 2.465078061
Evgeni Malkin 2.463475553
Jonathan Huberdeau 2.446076447
Claude Giroux 2.437439064
Jack Eichel 2.427407322
Alex Ovechkin 2.390567828
Evgenii Dadonov 2.31055357
Aleksander Barkov 2.300901453

I’d take these lists over straight all situations pts/gp as a guide for best player.
They line up with intuition quite well.

One thing of note on this list is that it shows how McDavid, Patrick Kane and Draisaitl are probably overworked and their production per minute probably decreased because of it.

Jaxon

Georgexs:
LT: (from Friday)

“Is there a long list of successful offensive players who are poor five-on-five performers?”

A long list? I’d guess no. Over their careers, successful offensive players have to be good 5v5 performers. 5v5 is too big a part of the game, too big a portion of the minutes that a forward plays. If he can’t consistently generate offense at 5v5, then he’s going to have a hard time accumulating enough total offense to rank among the “successful” performers. At least in the long term.

In the short term? The 75th percentile for 5v5 P60 for forwards in the past 12 seasons has been in the 1.7 to 1.9 range. Roughly 140 forwards score above that rate each season. Do successful offensive players occasionally fall in that range, i.e., produce 5v5 offense that lags behind over 100 other forwards in a given season? Yes. Hall, Crosby, Ovechkin, Bergeron, Stamkos, Marchand, Malkin, Kessel, Backstrom, Seguin, Toews, Pavelski, Getzlaf… they all had blips, landed around the 75th percentile mark in a season and bounced back. (The list is longer than where I stopped, btw.)

This touches on the noisy nature of 5v5 P60. It’s the weakest scoring metric to use when evaluating forwards, as the correlation numbers I’ll share in a bit will show.

Ryan said on Friday that producing at 5v5 is the hardest aspect of the game. If that’s the case, what can we say about forwards who score in the top ranks at 5v5 in a given season, i.e., forwards who’ve managed to excel at the “hardest aspect of the game”? 5v5 P60 should identify the best, most successful offensive forwards, right? Here, then, are the top 30 forwards at 5v5 P60 from last season, among forwards who played at least 10 games. (If I included all forwards, regardless of GP, the top 5 on 5v5 P60 would be Ryan Poehling, Brendan Gaunce, Zac Dalpe, Dominic Toninato, and Adam Johnson.)

Player, 5v5 P60

Nikita Kucherov, 3.37
Max Comtois, 3.33
Sidney Crosby, 2.92
Andrew Shaw, 2.9
Mitchell Marner, 2.87
John Tavares, 2.87
Johnny Gaudreau, 2.84
Connor McDavid, 2.82
Patrick Kane, 2.8
Max Domi, 2.8
Artemi Panarin, 2.8
Auston Matthews, 2.76
Brayden Point, 2.75
Patrice Bergeron, 2.69
Steven Stamkos, 2.67
Jake Guentzel, 2.67
Tomas Tatar, 2.66
Brett Connolly, 2.66
Brad Marchand, 2.66
Tomas Hertl, 2.61
Timo Meier, 2.58
Sean Monahan, 2.58
Leon Draisaitl, 2.57
Taylor Hall, 2.54
Viktor Arvidsson, 2.52
Paul Stastny, 2.52
Andreas Johnsson, 2.49
Alex Tuch, 2.48
Matt Duchene, 2.47
David Krejci, 2.47

The list above is supposed to represent successful offensive performers, as measured by 5v5 P60. Let’s compare it to the list of the top 30 forwards as measured by Pts/GP, again for forwards who played at least 10 games last season:

Player, Pts/GP

Nikita Kucherov, 1.56
Connor McDavid, 1.49
Patrick Kane, 1.36
Leon Draisaitl, 1.28
Sidney Crosby, 1.27
Brad Marchand, 1.27
David Pastrnak, 1.23
Patrice Bergeron, 1.22
Nathan MacKinnon, 1.21
Johnny Gaudreau, 1.21
Steven Stamkos, 1.20
Mikko Rantanen, 1.18
Aleksander Barkov, 1.17
Brayden Point, 1.16
Mitchell Marner, 1.15
Jonathan Huberdeau, 1.12
Taylor Hall, 1.12
Blake Wheeler, 1.11
Artemi Panarin, 1.10
Alex Ovechkin, 1.10
Auston Matthews, 1.07
John Tavares, 1.07
Jack Eichel, 1.06
Evgeni Malkin, 1.06
Sean Monahan, 1.05
Claude Giroux, 1.04
Alexander Radulov, 1.03
Gabriel Landeskog, 1.03
Mark Scheifele, 1.02
Sebastian Aho, 1.01

Which list would you say is more exclusive, tougher to break in to? Which list is better represented by “successful offensive performers”? Which metric better aligns with your idea of highly skilled, offensive forwards?

There are 16 names common to both lists, leaving 14 distinct names that are unique to each list, Which unique list of 14 would you bet on for future offensive performance?

Let’s go back a season to see what would have happened if we bet on the players on the 5v5 P60 list who didn’t make the Pts/GP list. In 2017-18, the following forwards ranked in the top 30 on 5v5 P60 but didn’t rank in the top 30 on Pts/GP:

Player, 17-18 5v5 P60, 18-19 5v5 P60

Valentin Zykov, 3.34, 0.76
Anthony Cirelli, 2.88, 1.69
Evgenii Dadonov, 2.74, 2.31
Yanni Gourde, 2.65, 2.08
Matthew Peca, 2.53, 1.35
Filip Forsberg, 2.53, 2.19
Ryan Spooner, 2.5, 0.92
William Karlsson, 2.49, 1.93
Ty Rattie, 2.49, 1.16
Jordan Eberle, 2.49, 1.41
Eric Staal, 2.48, 1.68
Thomas Vanek, 2.47, 1.87
Jaden Schwartz, 2.46, 1.77
Reilly Smith, 2.45, 1.91

As you can see, none of these names ranked in the top 30 on 5v5 P60 in 18-19. The mean 5v5 P60 for this group in 18-19 was 1.65, compared to 2.61 the season before, a pretty strong regression to the mean. This gives you a sense of how problematic 5v5 P60 is for forecasting future performance. Players yo-yo in a way that makes you question whether the metric is doing a good job of capturing underlying skill: skill, where it exists, should show through in repeated measurements.

The case against 5v5 P60 is much stronger than the examples I’ve given here. I’m hoping the examples get you thinking: a good, accurate metric shouldn’t run roughshod over your intuition and it shouldn’t produce such random results in consecutive measurements.

The issue I see with your argument isn’t a 5v5 vs All situations issue, it’s a per game vs per minute issue as all minutes aren’t created equally.

Try that list with 5v5 pts/gp and you’ll likely have a better picture of the best players than all situations pts/gp.

If you want to go to 5v5 pts/60 you need to separate the players who play against top competition from those who don’t via their 5v5 TOI. If you draw a line in the sand for forwards at approximately 12.5 minutes for top 6 forwards, or 13.72 for top line forwards. Anyone who plays less 5v5 minutes than that should not be included in your list of elite players. That will give you a list similar to the 5v5 pts/GP list.

Your argument changed two factors and argued that one was at fault (5v5 vs all situations) when I believe it was the other at fault ( per game vs per minute).

BONE207

Very good conversation today, Gang.

Woodguy…great article. I have a good feeling about Benson. This franchise could use some good trending arrows.

Sheps…interesting & informative.

Lowetide…thanks for your daily submission. Takes the sting out of airports.

Hunter!!!
Good to have your enthusiastic approach back in our crazy community. I’ll turn the tables then & start the year pessitimistically. Like HT Joe, too many things have to find its mark to get this Disorganization into playoff contention. The Chia era proved that.
79 points Oilers
16 goals Poolparty

JimmyV1965

stephen sheps:
*****WARNING: SPAM*****

Some of you know this already, especially if we’re connected on that twitter machine I rarely use, but over the last couple of years I’ve been researching and writing on hockey analytics and the erosion of evidence-based inquiry in the MSM. I interviewed a bunch of analytics folks (actual content creators) from around these parts and across Canada and the US to find out what they do, why they do it and how they’ve managed to push back against the ‘hockey men’ that seem to dominate the conversation in mainstream sport media.

After months of research and writing, going through the usual peer-review process and a round of revisions, I’m proud to announce that my article “Corsi, Fenwick and Gramsci: How bloggers and advanced analytics are changing the National Hockey League” has been published in the International Review for the Sociology of Sport.

If you have access to a university library that has the right subscription, you can find it here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1012690219869192

If you would like a copy, I’m happy to email you the pdf. feel free to drop me a line at stephensheps(at)gmail(dot)com. I tried my best to do right by this little community of ours, since this paper wouldn’t have happened without the encouragement of our host and a little help from a few folks that pop in here from time to time.

*****END SPAM*****

Very, very impressive. Congrats!!

YKOil

If Washington is looking to trade look for them to make one of Eller or Kempny available.

Everyone else is either:

a. untouchable
b. not worth it to trade (salary is already in the $1 million range)
c. just signed this year (which means the decision is fresh)

Wildcard would be Gudas (last year of deal) and I would be interested in him.

I would, because it is me, ask after Jensen. Benning with a little salary retained ($200k?), maybe add a later-round pick.

Glovjuice

HT Joe: Thanks Glovjuice… you’re too kind.

You bet. Good is good. ?

Glovjuice

Georgexs:
LT: (from Friday)

“Is there a long list of successful offensive players who are poor five-on-five performers?”

A long list? I’d guess no. Over their careers, successful offensive players have to be good 5v5 performers. 5v5 is too big a part of the game, too big a portion of the minutes that a forward plays. If he can’t consistently generate offense at 5v5, then he’s going to have a hard time accumulating enough total offense to rank among the “successful” performers. At least in the long term.

In the short term? The 75th percentile for 5v5 P60 for forwards in the past 12 seasons has been in the 1.7 to 1.9 range. Roughly 140 forwards score above that rate each season. Do successful offensive players occasionally fall in that range, i.e., produce 5v5 offense that lags behind over 100 other forwards in a given season? Yes. Hall, Crosby, Ovechkin, Bergeron, Stamkos, Marchand, Malkin, Kessel, Backstrom, Seguin, Toews, Pavelski, Getzlaf… they all had blips, landed around the 75th percentile mark in a season and bounced back. (The list is longer than where I stopped, btw.)

This touches on the noisy nature of 5v5 P60. It’s the weakest scoring metric to use when evaluating forwards, as the correlation numbers I’ll share in a bit will show.

Ryan said on Friday that producing at 5v5 is the hardest aspect of the game. If that’s the case, what can we say about forwards who score in the top ranks at 5v5 in a given season, i.e., forwards who’ve managed to excel at the “hardest aspect of the game”? 5v5 P60 should identify the best, most successful offensive forwards, right? Here, then, are the top 30 forwards at 5v5 P60 from last season, among forwards who played at least 10 games. (If I included all forwards, regardless of GP, the top 5 on 5v5 P60 would be Ryan Poehling, Brendan Gaunce, Zac Dalpe, Dominic Toninato, and Adam Johnson.)

Player, 5v5 P60

Nikita Kucherov, 3.37
Max Comtois, 3.33
Sidney Crosby, 2.92
Andrew Shaw, 2.9
Mitchell Marner, 2.87
John Tavares, 2.87
Johnny Gaudreau, 2.84
Connor McDavid, 2.82
Patrick Kane, 2.8
Max Domi, 2.8
Artemi Panarin, 2.8
Auston Matthews, 2.76
Brayden Point, 2.75
Patrice Bergeron, 2.69
Steven Stamkos, 2.67
Jake Guentzel, 2.67
Tomas Tatar, 2.66
Brett Connolly, 2.66
Brad Marchand, 2.66
Tomas Hertl, 2.61
Timo Meier, 2.58
Sean Monahan, 2.58
Leon Draisaitl, 2.57
Taylor Hall, 2.54
Viktor Arvidsson, 2.52
Paul Stastny, 2.52
Andreas Johnsson, 2.49
Alex Tuch, 2.48
Matt Duchene, 2.47
David Krejci, 2.47

The list above is supposed to represent successful offensive performers, as measured by 5v5 P60. Let’s compare it to the list of the top 30 forwards as measured by Pts/GP, again for forwards who played at least 10 games last season:

Player, Pts/GP

Nikita Kucherov, 1.56
Connor McDavid, 1.49
Patrick Kane, 1.36
Leon Draisaitl, 1.28
Sidney Crosby, 1.27
Brad Marchand, 1.27
David Pastrnak, 1.23
Patrice Bergeron, 1.22
Nathan MacKinnon, 1.21
Johnny Gaudreau, 1.21
Steven Stamkos, 1.20
Mikko Rantanen, 1.18
Aleksander Barkov, 1.17
Brayden Point, 1.16
Mitchell Marner, 1.15
Jonathan Huberdeau, 1.12
Taylor Hall, 1.12
Blake Wheeler, 1.11
Artemi Panarin, 1.10
Alex Ovechkin, 1.10
Auston Matthews, 1.07
John Tavares, 1.07
Jack Eichel, 1.06
Evgeni Malkin, 1.06
Sean Monahan, 1.05
Claude Giroux, 1.04
Alexander Radulov, 1.03
Gabriel Landeskog, 1.03
Mark Scheifele, 1.02
Sebastian Aho, 1.01

Which list would you say is more exclusive, tougher to break in to? Which list is better represented by “successful offensive performers”? Which metric better aligns with your idea of highly skilled, offensive forwards?

There are 16 names common to both lists, leaving 14 distinct names that are unique to each list, Which unique list of 14 would you bet on for future offensive performance?

Let’s go back a season to see what would have happened if we bet on the players on the 5v5 P60 list who didn’t make the Pts/GP list. In 2017-18, the following forwards ranked in the top 30 on 5v5 P60 but didn’t rank in the top 30 on Pts/GP:

Player, 17-18 5v5 P60, 18-19 5v5 P60

Valentin Zykov, 3.34, 0.76
Anthony Cirelli, 2.88, 1.69
Evgenii Dadonov, 2.74, 2.31
Yanni Gourde, 2.65, 2.08
Matthew Peca, 2.53, 1.35
Filip Forsberg, 2.53, 2.19
Ryan Spooner, 2.5, 0.92
William Karlsson, 2.49, 1.93
Ty Rattie, 2.49, 1.16
Jordan Eberle, 2.49, 1.41
Eric Staal, 2.48, 1.68
Thomas Vanek, 2.47, 1.87
Jaden Schwartz, 2.46, 1.77
Reilly Smith, 2.45, 1.91

As you can see, none of these names ranked in the top 30 on 5v5 P60 in 18-19. The mean 5v5 P60 for this group in 18-19 was 1.65, compared to 2.61 the season before, a pretty strong regression to the mean. This gives you a sense of how problematic 5v5 P60 is for forecasting future performance. Players yo-yo in a way that makes you question whether the metric is doing a good job of capturing underlying skill: skill, where it exists, should show through in repeated measurements.

The case against 5v5 P60 is much stronger than the examples I’ve given here. I’m hoping the examples get you thinking: a good, accurate metric shouldn’t run roughshod over your intuition and it shouldn’t produce such random results in consecutive measurements.

The more we dig into these various stats the more I think +/- (at lest vis-a-vis teammates) is not as bad as we all are thinking.

HT Joe

Glovjuice: Agreed, an all time great post.

Thanks Glovjuice… you’re too kind.

YKOil

Hunter:

82 points
22 goals for JP (no early trade)

Sheps: well done sir!

jp

stephen sheps: I thought Belov had potential, yeah. But mostly I started doing the Belov Bonus because it sounded funny to me, and it opened things up for countless terrible “this is Anton and his other brother Anton” jokes that were in character with the cheesy Russian/80s TV references I was already making in the series.

Just for you though, I’ll keep an eye on Rieder from time to time. Why not, right?

I thought he had potential too, but it wasn’t to be. A good reminder for our expectations on Persson/Nygard/Haas. And I hadn’t realized the depth of Anton Belov’s importance to the weekly Yak, well done.

As for Rieder, he sure did get a lot of our attention last summer. Makes sense as the ‘marque’ signing of the summer I guess. But yeah, post Rieder updates only if you’re feeling it. I’ll be checking periodically and will post updates on him and others now and again too.

Congratulations on the paper too!! Looking forward to having a closer look very soon.

Jethro Tull

jp: I think both are very important.

I agree with this, I think.

But what is “real baseline result”? You’re setting Chiasson’s baseline as the best season of his career. It’s a problem

Why is it valuable to remove short handed goals?

I have exactly 0 shg scored against me in the NHL. Ricki, where’s my cheque?

Glovjuice

hunter1909: If it’s okay with Lowetide and yourself, I’d like to stick this brilliant post on the Death March™ website; front and centre.

Agreed, an all time great post.

Glovjuice

OriginalPouzar:
The word I meant to use was “supplemented”.

Yeah, something tells me a successful lawyer knows those two words. Unless SS is joking (I hope) he is falling into the typical academic smarty pants trap. I’ve worked with many of them.

jp

rickithebear:
JP:
Which is the more important skill.
Shooting the puck in open space in net elevation past the goalie.
Or
Passing the puck between players.

I think both are very important.

rickithebear:

Fans let their opinion of a player be formed by flashy plays.
Rather than real baseline result.

I agree with this, I think.

But what is “real baseline result”? You’re setting Chiasson’s baseline as the best season of his career. It’s a problem

rickithebear:

When it comes to high standard of base play.
21 NSHG is fucking beautiful for 2.15M

Why is it valuable to remove short handed goals?

stephen sheps

To everyone that has emailed, commented or otherwise expressed interest at all in my article today – thank you. I’m totally floored by the responses and kind words from so many of you. The project was inspired by the conversations that came from this place and in many ways the work belongs to this community as well. I’m forever grateful.

stephen sheps

Yeti: Although Richard always claimed that he hated that title…

That’s very true, he does hate that title. But it was a good read and I learned a lot from him, even though I’m doing completely different work than I did back then

stephen sheps

Ryan: The ‘Hockey men’ in their cloistered NHL environment are drawing on a population largely with no additional selective forces. It’s surprising that it’s taken this long to look outside their ranks to gain a competitive advantage

I completely agree. It’s shocking it has taken this long, but hockey seems to be much slower and more resistant to change than the other major sports, at least based on the research I’ve done. I wonder how much of it can actually be attributed to the closed loop of ex-players becoming coaches, management and media personalities (who are sometimes ex-players, coaches and management types). The recent culling at sportsnet is interesting as two of the ‘hockey men’ types were the most prominent names on the list.

Yeti

stephen sheps: Edit #2 – My PhD supervisor actually wrote a book called Gramsci is Dead. The book was about activism, anarchism and social movements. The fact that I ‘brought him back to life’ for a project on hockey has been a constant source of laughs between us for a couple of years now.

Although Richard always claimed that he hated that title…

HT Joe

hunter1909: If it’s okay with Lowetide and yourself, I’d like to stick this brilliant post on the Death March™ website; front and centre.

You are being way too generous, but thank you. As far as I’m concerned, please feel free to copy and paste as you wish. Thank you so much for running the Death March (and a huge thank you to Lowetide for enabling this within the community you nurtured and built). 😀

Thanks Harpers Hair.

hunter1909

Professor Q:
OILERS: 99 points, for Wayne Gretzky.

J. P. : 21 goals, for Stan Mikita.

HOWEVER

With the Carolina talks heating up recently and Justin Williams “retiring by any other name” just now, the Puljujärvi trade might be imminent.

So maybe 8-12 goals before that happens, within 1-3 months?

Fine. 8, for Alex Ovechkin.

You are down for 99 points, and 21 goals.

Hunter1909’s 2019-20 Death March™ employs the “Bridge of Death” method. Only the first prediction counts.

ps: If you can talk a lawyer say like Original Pouzar to plead your case at the new upcoming planned Death March™ website, then please feel free to argue further.

Professor Q

OILERS: 99 points, for Wayne Gretzky.

J. P. : 21 goals, for Stan Mikita.

HOWEVER

With the Carolina talks heating up recently and Justin Williams “retiring by any other name” just now, the Puljujärvi trade might be imminent.

So maybe 8-12 goals before that happens, within 1-3 months?

Fine. 8, for Alex Ovechkin.

Harpers Hair

HT Joe:
Hunter:

Improvements vs. the 2018-2019 years:
– replacing Lucic with Neal (just getting Lucic out of the top 6 is a win)
– upgrading the bottom six
– a Smith / Koskinen tandem (vs Koskinen / Talbot last year)
– replacing “That coach in gray” and Hitch (I loved Hitch’s post-games) with Tippett
– replacing Chia and his nonsensical morale-destroying in-season trades with Holland
– a full season of Gagner (vs. having Spooner playing 1/3 of a season)
None of these upgrades are substantial, but each of them nudges the team in the right direction.

Losses vs. the 2018-2019 years:
– McDavid is going to start the season getting over an injury so they probably shouldn’t play hims as many minutes over the first couple of weeks
– A reasonable fan should expect fewer minutes and fewer points for Draisatl and McDavid
– I felt that Sekera was ripe to return partially to form, which would have been a huge help – though I understand the decision, I remain disappointed that they bought him out
– blueliners don’t develop in a straight line, and I expect some regression for Nurse’s points
– The Oilers didn’t suffer too many injuries in-season last year, and are due for more substantial man-games lost this upcoming season

The Oilers were 14th of 15 Western Conference teams last year, and with the selection of Broberg, their first overall will not help them win games in 2019-2020 (unlike, say, the Ducks who picked one spot after).While the Oilers traded Lucic for Neal, that won’t likely make the team markedly better… it will just make future cap and Seattle draft management easier.Smith had a great playoffs but the regular season wasn’t amazing, and Talbot (based on age and the blueliners he’ll be playing behind in Calgary) seems more likely to have the rebound season.Kailer should stay in the AHL, and Jesse isn’t likely coming back.I don’t see one big thing that made the team better.

Maybe the goaltenders make an amazing tandem and McDavid / Drai keep on putting up crazy numbers, but in terms of a reasonable expectation, I don’t see the Oilers ending up higher 3rd last in the west.This would average to 76 points over the last 4 seasons.

As for Jesse, what a waste of a draft pick.I don’t know why he won’t play for the Oilers, but time to guess his success this season with Karpat.Karpat will play 60 games, and a few years ago, there were 2 30-goal scorers in the entire league, and only 1 in 2018-2019.24 goals would have been top-5 in the league last year.Jesse is a great talent, big, hopefully motivated, and moving back home.However, he’s coming off of double-hip surgery, though he scored in his first game.I suspect he gets better as the season wears on, and as crazy as this may sound, I’m betting 23 goals if he plays a full season.I have faith that Holland is savvy enough to not trade him until absolutely necessary (i.e., not rush into something before December 1st, since that’s the agent’s deadline, and not Holland’s).

Hunter:Please put me down for 76 points for the Oilers 2019-2020 seasons, and 23 goals (he’s not getting traded before 2020 offseason)

Excellent analysis.
Colorado, Dallas, Arizona, Vancouver much improved.
St. Louis won’t be as weak in the regular season.
The rest about the same.

Rich M

stephen sheps,

Outstanding read Stephen. Start to finish.

hunter1909

How about those Amazing Flames? Talbot+Lucic both itching for payback.

hunter1909

HT Joe:
Hunter:

Improvements vs. the 2018-2019 years:
– replacing Lucic with Neal (just getting Lucic out of the top 6 is a win)
– upgrading the bottom six
– a Smith / Koskinen tandem (vs Koskinen / Talbot last year)
– replacing “That coach in gray” and Hitch (I loved Hitch’s post-games) with Tippett
– replacing Chia and his nonsensical morale-destroying in-season trades with Holland
– a full season of Gagner (vs. having Spooner playing 1/3 of a season)
None of these upgrades are substantial, but each of them nudges the team in the right direction.

Losses vs. the 2018-2019 years:
– McDavid is going to start the season getting over an injury so they probably shouldn’t play hims as many minutes over the first couple of weeks
– A reasonable fan should expect fewer minutes and fewer points for Draisatl and McDavid
– I felt that Sekera was ripe to return partially to form, which would have been a huge help – though I understand the decision, I remain disappointed that they bought him out
– blueliners don’t develop in a straight line, and I expect some regression for Nurse’s points
– The Oilers didn’t suffer too many injuries in-season last year, and are due for more substantial man-games lost this upcoming season

The Oilers were 14th of 15 Western Conference teams last year, and with the selection of Broberg, their first overall will not help them win games in 2019-2020 (unlike, say, the Ducks who picked one spot after).While the Oilers traded Lucic for Neal, that won’t likely make the team markedly better… it will just make future cap and Seattle draft management easier.Smith had a great playoffs but the regular season wasn’t amazing, and Talbot (based on age and the blueliners he’ll be playing behind in Calgary) seems more likely to have the rebound season.Kailer should stay in the AHL, and Jesse isn’t likely coming back.I don’t see one big thing that made the team better.

Maybe the goaltenders make an amazing tandem and McDavid / Drai keep on putting up crazy numbers, but in terms of a reasonable expectation, I don’t see the Oilers ending up higher 3rd last in the west.This would average to 76 points over the last 4 seasons.

As for Jesse, what a waste of a draft pick.I don’t know why he won’t play for the Oilers, but time to guess his success this season with Karpat.Karpat will play 60 games, and a few years ago, there were 2 30-goal scorers in the entire league, and only 1 in 2018-2019.24 goals would have been top-5 in the league last year.Jesse is a great talent, big, hopefully motivated, and moving back home.However, he’s coming off of double-hip surgery, though he scored in his first game.I suspect he gets better as the season wears on, and as crazy as this may sound, I’m betting 23 goals if he plays a full season.I have faith that Holland is savvy enough to not trade him until absolutely necessary (i.e., not rush into something before December 1st, since that’s the agent’s deadline, and not Holland’s).

Hunter:Please put me down for 76 points for the Oilers 2019-2020 seasons, and 23 goals (he’s not getting traded before 2020 offseason)

If it’s okay with Lowetide and yourself, I’d like to stick this brilliant post on the Death March™ website; front and centre.

Ryan

stephen sheps:
Ryan,

Thanks for reading and for the feedback – the main reason I only used 11 interviews this time was because the remaining 4 interviews just didn’t quite fit this article’s scope, but I knew they’d be useful for another one that I’m working on out of the same data set. Stay tuned.

If any other questions come up, feel free to leave them here or shoot me an email. Happy to talk about it any time.

Reading the Vollman quote, it occurred to me the that the issue between the Nerds and ‘Hockey men’ could be ascribed to a rift due to a cataclysmic gap in Spearman’s g factor.

In hockey, sometimes you’ll run into that, where you’ve explained something and it’s not that they disagree with your interpretation of the results or that they disagree with the way you gathered the data or how you got there, but they don’t even see value in even measuring something. Why would you even count how many of those events occurred, why would you even base an opinion on a measurement. That’s literally where they sort of get stuck.

The ‘Hockey men’ in their cloistered NHL environment are drawing on a population largely with no additional selective forces. It’s surprising that it’s taken this long to look outside their ranks to gain a competitive advantage.

northerndancer

*****WARNING: SPAM*****

Some of you know this already, especially if we’re connected on that twitter machine I rarely use, but over the last couple of years I’ve been researching and writing on hockey analytics and the erosion of evidence-based inquiry in the MSM. I interviewed a bunch of analytics folks (actual content creators) from around these parts and across Canada and the US to find out what they do, why they do it and how they’ve managed to push back against the ‘hockey men’ that seem to dominate the conversation in mainstream sport media.

After months of research and writing, going through the usual peer-review process and a round of revisions, I’m proud to announce that my article “Corsi, Fenwick and Gramsci: How bloggers and advanced analytics are changing the National Hockey League” has been published in the International Review for the Sociology of Sport.

If you have access to a university library that has the right subscription, you can find it here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1012690219869192

If you would like a copy, I’m happy to email you the pdf. feel free to drop me a line at stephensheps(at)gmail(dot)com. I tried my best to do right by this little community of ours, since this paper wouldn’t have happened without the encouragement of our host and a little help from a few folks that pop in here from time to time.

*****END SPAM*****

Congratulations Stephen Sheps! I have pm’d you and can’t wait to read it. Gramsci was strickly a first line kind of guy in my view.

What a community you have created Lowetide. Beer review time everyone.

Melvis

Woodguy v2.0:
*****WARNING: SPAM*****

New Because Oilers:

Projecting Tyler Benson’s 19/20 season using 28 guys who scored at very similar rates to Benson in the AHL as 20 year olds.

http://becauseoilers.blogspot.com/2019/09/projecting-tyler-bensons-1920-season.html

*****END SPAM*****

You’re not doing nearly enough detailed homework during the off season young man. Time someone cracked the whip. ?

Melvis

Hi Hunter!

I’ll take 93 for the Oilers and 23 G for JP.
Thanks.

JamesL

Hunter, put ol’ Jimmy down for 77 points for the Oilers and 20Gs for Jesse.

GB&Q

hunter1909,

99 points for Oil.
21 G for JP

buffalobill

hunter1909,

Hunter, I will take 107 points and 17 goals please and thank you

dmjkrash

Munny:
This whole Labour Day Classic thing is not going well.

Maas has got to go. No surprise in this boring offense he runs. Few penalties but they came at the worst point possible ( kick return for TD, defensive stop)

Abbeef

Hunter

Please put me down for 96 pts (improved dzone coverage and pk)

3 goals (traded before the end of training camp)

Munny

This whole Labour Day Classic thing is not going well.

HT Joe

Hunter:

Improvements vs. the 2018-2019 years:
– replacing Lucic with Neal (just getting Lucic out of the top 6 is a win)
– upgrading the bottom six
– a Smith / Koskinen tandem (vs Koskinen / Talbot last year)
– replacing “That coach in gray” and Hitch (I loved Hitch’s post-games) with Tippett
– replacing Chia and his nonsensical morale-destroying in-season trades with Holland
– a full season of Gagner (vs. having Spooner playing 1/3 of a season)
None of these upgrades are substantial, but each of them nudges the team in the right direction.

Losses vs. the 2018-2019 years:
– McDavid is going to start the season getting over an injury so they probably shouldn’t play hims as many minutes over the first couple of weeks
– A reasonable fan should expect fewer minutes and fewer points for Draisatl and McDavid
– I felt that Sekera was ripe to return partially to form, which would have been a huge help – though I understand the decision, I remain disappointed that they bought him out
– blueliners don’t develop in a straight line, and I expect some regression for Nurse’s points
– The Oilers didn’t suffer too many injuries in-season last year, and are due for more substantial man-games lost this upcoming season

The Oilers were 14th of 15 Western Conference teams last year, and with the selection of Broberg, their first overall will not help them win games in 2019-2020 (unlike, say, the Ducks who picked one spot after). While the Oilers traded Lucic for Neal, that won’t likely make the team markedly better… it will just make future cap and Seattle draft management easier. Smith had a great playoffs but the regular season wasn’t amazing, and Talbot (based on age and the blueliners he’ll be playing behind in Calgary) seems more likely to have the rebound season. Kailer should stay in the AHL, and Jesse isn’t likely coming back. I don’t see one big thing that made the team better.

Maybe the goaltenders make an amazing tandem and McDavid / Drai keep on putting up crazy numbers, but in terms of a reasonable expectation, I don’t see the Oilers ending up higher 3rd last in the west. This would average to 76 points over the last 4 seasons.

As for Jesse, what a waste of a draft pick. I don’t know why he won’t play for the Oilers, but time to guess his success this season with Karpat. Karpat will play 60 games, and a few years ago, there were 2 30-goal scorers in the entire league, and only 1 in 2018-2019. 24 goals would have been top-5 in the league last year. Jesse is a great talent, big, hopefully motivated, and moving back home. However, he’s coming off of double-hip surgery, though he scored in his first game. I suspect he gets better as the season wears on, and as crazy as this may sound, I’m betting 23 goals if he plays a full season. I have faith that Holland is savvy enough to not trade him until absolutely necessary (i.e., not rush into something before December 1st, since that’s the agent’s deadline, and not Holland’s).

Hunter: Please put me down for 76 points for the Oilers 2019-2020 seasons, and 23 goals (he’s not getting traded before 2020 offseason)

Woodguy v2.0

stephen sheps: I thought Belov had potential, yeah. But mostly I started doing the Belov Bonus because it sounded funny to me, and it opened things up for countless terrible “this is Anton and his other brother Anton” jokes that were in character with the cheesy Russian/80s TV references I was already making in the series.

Just for you though, I’ll keep an eye on Rieder from time to time. Why not, right?

That’s some tasty spam. Well written and thought out, as always

Thanks Stephen.

Also congrats again on being published!

I enjoyed your paper and found it informative in a subject I know well.

Woodguy v2.0

Scungilli Slushy: Really good thx for that

Thanks Slushy

stephen sheps

Ryan,

Thanks for reading and for the feedback – the main reason I only used 11 interviews this time was because the remaining 4 interviews just didn’t quite fit this article’s scope, but I knew they’d be useful for another one that I’m working on out of the same data set. Stay tuned.

If any other questions come up, feel free to leave them here or shoot me an email. Happy to talk about it any time.

ArmchairGM

OriginalPouzar:
The Yak updates will be superseded by the Konovalov updates and, if he graduates from the MHL, the Denezhkin.

As the non-NHL players start playing, I apologize in advance for the quantity of updates. I enjoy it though.

Can’t have too many prospect updates. I don’t like reading the same piece 3 times though, if that’s your intention!

Ryan

stephen sheps:
Lowetide,

Thanks LT. Seriously, I couldn’t have done it without the help of some people that contribute to this place, yourself included. Your encouragement (and willingness to read the first draft) was a significant part of this project.

Very cool!

I gave it a quick scan, very interesting exposition of the battle between hockey men and nerds.

Really enjoyed your ability to use term “hockey men” without the pejorative connotation it has here.

Missed the explanation of why you interviewed 15 people, but only used 11 interviews?

Lastly, when I read the word “netnography,” the first thing I thought of was “ethnography,” the second, Jane Goodall and I felt like a virtual chimpanzee lol.

OriginalPouzar

The word I meant to use was “supplemented”.

rickithebear

JP:
Which is the more important skill.
Shooting the puck in open space in net elevation past the goalie.
Or
Passing the puck between players.

Chiasson 2@ 2.15M
#43 RW 13 Evg; #42 Fwd 8 ppg; 21 non SH goals (NSHG)

RW in 18-19
Buchnevich (2@3.25) 14 evg; 7 ppg; 21 nshgnshg; (24 – 25)
Chaisson (2@2.15); 13 evg, 8ppg; 21 nshg; (28 – 29 yr)
D. Brown (3@5.875); 12 evg; 9 ppg; 21 nshg; (34 – 36)
Eberle (5@5.5); 12 evg; 7 ppg; 19 nshg; (29 – 33)
R. Smith (3@5.0); 14 evg; 4 ppg; 18 nshg; (28 – 30)
Hornquist (4@5.3); 12 evg; 6 ppg; 18 nshg; (32 – 35)
K. Hayes (7@7.143); 14 evg; 3 ppg; 17 nshg; (27 – 33)
Bailey (5 @ 5.0); 13 evg; 2 ppg; 15 nshg; (29 – 33)
Keller ELC (3@1.67); 13 evg; 1 ppg; 14 nshgnshg; (21 – 23)
Donskoi (4@3.9); 13 Evg; 1 ppg; 14 nshg; (27 – 30)
Panik (4 @ 2.75); 13 evg; 0 ppg; 13 nshgnshg; (28 – 31)

I hear all the Chiasson is not a top 6 fwd,
we would do better with …….

One of my important theories is “False eye affect”
Fans let their opinion of a player be formed by flashy plays.
Rather than real baseline result.

Their are elite passers who can generate a high % of easy open space shots.
But they are a limited few.

When it comes to high standard of base play.
21 NSHG is fucking beautiful for 2.15M

Top GA teams are 7 of every 8 final 4 team.

A lot of False eye disciples.
Think a good Dman is
– abandoning HD area.
– causing a Dpair to have bottom 60 evga/60
– generating even goals at 4 times less than Foreards.

Just brutal baseline def play!
It is counter to NJD, DET, CHI, LAK def play.

stephen sheps

OriginalPouzar:
The Yak updates will be superseded by the Konovalov updates and, if he graduates from the MHL, the Denezhkin.

As the non-NHL players start playing, I apologize in advance for the quantity of updates. I enjoy it though.

I’m not sure supersede means what you think it means.

Happy to have you provide updates on whomever you’d like, but The Weekly Yak is not being replaced.

OriginalPouzar

dmjkrash:
97’s knee scares me too as I have heard it’s been totally misdiagnosed.

Given the resources at the disposal of the player and the organization, I anticipate that you were misled…..

Genjutsu

OriginalPouzar:
The Yak updates will be superseded by the Konovalov updates and, if he graduates from the MHL, the Denezhkin.

As the non-NHL players start playing, I apologize in advance for the quantity of updates. I enjoy it though.

Thanks for all the updates. I enjoy reading them.

OriginalPouzar

The Yak updates will be supplemented by the Konovalov updates and, if he graduates from the MHL, the Denezhkin.

As the non-NHL players start playing, I apologize in advance for the quantity of updates. I enjoy it though.